Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv; LiteKeeper
There is another possibility which to me seems quite likely.

That the device was made much later than the date of the shipwreck, that it was being transported by sea over the wreck and due to a second wreck or some act of vandalism, caused to sink onto the older wreck, where it was eventually found.

IIRC, devices with this level of sophistication were being developed as early as the late renaissance.
18 posted on 08/14/2004 9:37:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Who was Madame Binh's messenger boy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

There is too much corroborating evidence to the contrary and an early date


19 posted on 08/14/2004 9:47:56 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Chaplain, US Army, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
"That the device was made much later than the date of the shipwreck," isn't possible. The device was inside a concretion that was part of the wreck debris. Interestingly enough, off Turkey some years ago an "age of sail" wreck was found near some scary rock; under it was a sandwich of two other wrecks, the oldest being ancient. Each had hit the rock in turn, probably in the night, and each sank to rest on the same bit of seabottom.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

22 posted on 08/15/2004 7:20:29 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson