Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Constitution Party

Posted on 03/03/2004 1:08:57 PM PST by EveningStar

Are there any Constitution Party members or would-be members here?

You folks certainly have an "interesting" party platform.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: constitutionparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 03/03/2004 1:08:57 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Yes, there are. And they "recruit" here........LOL.
2 posted on 03/03/2004 1:09:39 PM PST by Howlin (Just another unrepentant Bush supporter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Uh oh. NOW you've done it.
3 posted on 03/03/2004 1:10:01 PM PST by Constitution Day ("The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
This should be an "interesting" thread...
4 posted on 03/03/2004 1:10:38 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I have one foot in the Constitution Party and one in the Republican Party. Let them earn my vote. As far as president goes, Bush earned my vote with his strong FMA support.
5 posted on 03/03/2004 1:11:11 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Someone grab me a beer. I gotta see this....
6 posted on 03/03/2004 1:11:24 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (""....but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America"")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Yet another Constipation Party wannabe...
7 posted on 03/03/2004 1:11:24 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I still think it's a hoot that their "national chairman" is named Clymer.
8 posted on 03/03/2004 1:14:22 PM PST by Constitution Day ("The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
If the FR poll this am is any indication they are only 2-3% of the FR posters at the time I voted.
9 posted on 03/03/2004 1:14:40 PM PST by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

10 posted on 03/03/2004 1:14:41 PM PST by TheBigB (I know you are but what am I? =P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; Poohbah; dighton; aculeus; general_re; L,TOWM; hellinahandcart; Thinkin' Gal
Constitution Day and Poohbah ... I'm very disappointed. Y'all are having a Constitution Party hanging and I wasn't even invited.

Sniff .... I would have even offered to bring the cheese whiz ....

11 posted on 03/03/2004 1:14:43 PM PST by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
So sorry, Blue. It was really just a spur-of-the-moment thing.
12 posted on 03/03/2004 1:18:21 PM PST by Constitution Day ("The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer; aculeus; dighton; Constitution Day
What color are the candidates? And will they clash with the Libertarians? Remember Stan Jones, the "blue" candidate?


13 posted on 03/03/2004 1:19:50 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer; Constitution Day; Poohbah; dighton; aculeus; hellinahandcart
So, um, what color are thier candidates?

San Jones, Libertarian Party candidate for Senate in Montanta. By law, in order to properly identify themselves as Libertarians, all members running for office must be blue. (It's a public safety issue)

Now, Green Party members do NOT have to color themselves any color, although many choose to anyway, but they DO have to wear a rotating "Drudge Siren" on their heads at all times.


14 posted on 03/03/2004 1:29:51 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
Perhaps your sister's moose will bring some cheeze whiz...
15 posted on 03/03/2004 2:00:57 PM PST by PreviouslyA-Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
The mods didn't think so. They moved it to "Chat."
16 posted on 03/03/2004 3:15:30 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
When I said their platform was "interesting," I was being diplomatic. I can't believe these people are serious.
17 posted on 03/03/2004 3:17:09 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Yes. I love their platform. Not only do they mean what they say, they act on it unlike two other parties we could mention. :0)
18 posted on 03/03/2004 10:12:27 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (SHUT THE DOOR IN 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
what exactly is 'interesting' about their platform? I didn't read the entire thing, but from what I did read, I wish the Republican Party sounded a bit more like them.
19 posted on 03/04/2004 2:03:57 PM PST by CharlieOK1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlieOK1
Much of what they say I agree with, however some of what they say makes me a bit uneasy.

Preamble:

Are they advocating a theocracy?

AIDS:

"Criminal penalties should apply to those whose willful acts of omission or commission place members of the public at risk of contracting AIDS or HIV."

What's that all about? Are they going to throw gay men in jail?

Congressional Reform:

"...repeal the Seventeenth Amendment and return to state legislatures the function of electing the U.S. Senate."

Why should we trust the state legislators more than we trust ourselves?

Election Reform:

"In order to avoid election fraud, we urge an end to electronic or mechanical voting processes and a return to the manual counting process overseen by, and accountable to, voters resident in each precinct where the votes are cast."

And turning back the clock to 1900 will do this?

Electoral College:

Here they are doing away with the General Ticket in presidential elections. The general ticket shows the actual names of the presidential and vice presidential candidates. They wish to return to the time when only the names of the presidential electors were on the ballot. We would vote for the electors and give them the actual responsibility of electing the president.

Do you really want to trust someone else to elect the president?

20 posted on 03/04/2004 4:24:34 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson