To: Momaw Nadon
Most likely a speck of dust in the air. But it's great for the tinfoil industry.
5 posted on
02/08/2004 10:31:38 AM PST by
thoughtomator
("What do I know? I'm just the President." - George W. Bush, Superbowl XXXVIII halftime statement)
To: thoughtomator
It is a bit interesting that
YOUR dust mote
has the right saucer shape with a standard proportioned bulge on top.
8 posted on
02/08/2004 10:47:36 AM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: thoughtomator
Most likely a speck of dust in the air. I would doubt that is the explanation.
17 posted on
02/08/2004 11:10:20 AM PST by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: thoughtomator
Most likely a speck of dust in the air. It appears to be too geometric to be dust. And it appears to be a good distance from the camera.
24 posted on
02/08/2004 11:16:59 AM PST by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: thoughtomator
Makes sense. 2D photos have no depth so distance is hard to derive.
110 posted on
02/08/2004 3:59:17 PM PST by
Bogey78O
(Why are we even having this debate?)
To: thoughtomator
Most likely a speck of dust in the air. But it's great for the tinfoil industry.
Any speck of dust capable of being supported by Martian air for a long enough time to take an unblurred shot would have to be mighty tiny. As far as it being a speck of dust on the lens, it should then show up in previous or succeeding shots.
123 posted on
02/09/2004 7:06:59 AM PST by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson