To: hurly
Am glad you have no personal bias against ancient nor modern miracles. That's what I bristle at so quickly.
I'm saying to you that I don't believe the SORT of meticulously documented medical proof you are asking for exists in this situation.
It was as I reported a simple thing.
If you have had a serious pain or other overt medical problem and carried it for days to months or years, then in a meeting, it is suddenly gone, you don't need X-Rays to prove anything.
Anyway--I'll try and track down the longer report. But it will NOT satisfy you in the least. It may give you a more robust description from which to make a judgment.
IT IS CLEAR that you
FAVOR MAKING A TYPE II error instead of a TYPE I error. That arbitrary preference is always illogical and a little mystifying to me.
36 posted on
02/03/2004 9:15:29 AM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Quix
I said I have no bias against "miracles". Didn't say I believe in them, modern or ancient.
I can not and do not argue about feelings or subjective statements. If you said some people felt better after viewing the film, I would have no disagreement about that.
Thank you for a lively discussion even thought you wished me to have cancer to prove your gods benevolence.
39 posted on
02/03/2004 9:27:16 AM PST by
hurly
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson