To: Quix
I said I have no bias against "miracles". Didn't say I believe in them, modern or ancient.
I can not and do not argue about feelings or subjective statements. If you said some people felt better after viewing the film, I would have no disagreement about that.
Thank you for a lively discussion even thought you wished me to have cancer to prove your gods benevolence.
39 posted on
02/03/2004 9:27:16 AM PST by
hurly
To: hurly
I had
LESS THAN 0.00000000% WISH
for you to have cancer.
I don't even wish for Shrillery to have cancer. I was using that as an illustration of how serious I believe your skepticism is.
Are you really that sensitive about a hypothetical illustration?
You seem addicted toward TYPE II errors as a matter of habit while largely ignoring the probability of a TYPE I error. I find that illogical and even a bit mystifying.
42 posted on
02/03/2004 9:42:40 AM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: hurly
I do think
your jumping to uncalled for conclusions about my cancer illustration
is NOT
consistent with good logical perception, analysis or discernment.
44 posted on
02/03/2004 2:48:14 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson