[Ramius]

Agreed Mr Mag.

I got into a most disagreeable argument with one of the guys in my office some weeks back, and it really left me somewhat stunned.

He's a bigtime Bush-hater, and I knew that going in. Whatever, I figgered. I've got facts on my side. No worries.

But as the discussion deteriorated over the space of the evening it became clear that his hatred of Bush was far beyond any rational explanation. I finally had to ask him point blank what really upset him so much about Bush.

"Because Bush will suspend the constitution and will set up a Christian Theocratic government and will outlaw any further elections."

I just sat there with my mouth agape. What do you say to that? I'd like to think he's just nutty, but I really think that he's merely a window into the current "progressive" thinking. I think this is what they really do happen to believe.

[Bear_in_RoseBear]

What do you say to that?

I woulda said, "You're a f***in' nut!"

[Wneighbor]

"Because Bush will suspend the constitution and will set up a Christian Theocratic government and will outlaw any further elections."

Doesn't make sense at all. How *can* they think that?

I've run into some pretty vehement Bush-haters but never gotten a statement like that. I would categorize myself as a Bush-lover sure, but I could actually wish that his policies would be more Christian. I'm thinkin' he's takin' a cooperative middle-of-the-road position on several issues in order to satisfy the libs.

I wouldn't compromise as much as he does. But, I wouldn't be electable to office either.

disclaimer: this is not bashing, just what I think, I'll still stand up and fight FOR him with anybody.

[300winmag]

"Because Bush will suspend the constitution and will set up a Christian Theocratic government and will outlaw any further elections."

Reagan was suspected of planning the same thing. So was Nixon, but that was just because he was pure evil, not because of Christianity.

After studying soviet communism, I've seen that commies accused us of attempting to do that which they already had planned. The RATs saw the 2000 election as Bush using some sort of strange powers to get the Supreme Court to declare him president. I saw the 2000 election as the klintons' attempt to overthrow the rule of law, and install their puppet Algore to keep the seat in the Oral Office warm.

Their continued possession of the FBI files, and their dictatorial control of the RAT party, indicates to me that they are waging a low-grade civil war against us already. So far their weapons are smear and inuendo, with the occasional unexplainable death.

I have no doubt that if Sept. 11 happened while Bill and Hiltery were copresidents, we'd be under martial law today while they tore up the countryside looking for the rightwing Christians who flew those planes into the buildings. After that, any elections would be like those in Stalin's USSR, where he got 99.999% of the vote, and they were looking for the guy who voted against him.

The RATS, since FDR, have desired a one-party system like some banana republic, with a godlike "president for life". They got within 500 votes in Florida of almost pulling it off. They still have a lot of capability of trying it again.

[SuziQ]

but I really think that he's merely a window into the current "progressive" thinking. I think this is what they really do happen to believe.

He's a fine example of what my dear old departed Daddy used to say; "He needs his a$$ examined, cause he's already lost his head!"