Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peggy Noonan: 'Passion' and Intrigue- The story of the Vatican and Mel Gibson's film gets curiouser
Opinion Journal ^ | 01/22/04 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 01/21/2004 9:03:36 PM PST by Pokey78

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:06:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-223 last
To: OLD REGGIE
Do you ever read your Scriptural citations? Forget for the moment that in Matthew 18:18 Jesus was speaking to more than one. In Luke 10:16 Jesus was speaking to at least 70+. Were they all Popes?

This may come as a colossal surprise for you but the doctrine of infallibility doesn't ONLY apply to the Pope, it also applies to the whole Magisterium in Communion with the Pope. The Pope is only the head of the Church, who must give his Imprimatur to the acts of Church Councils and what not. The Pope also has a particular Charism that generally pertains to his definitions of doctrine formed by the Magisterium.

You should understand that I was not arguing for the Pope's special infallibility, that is a separate issue from the question of infallibility in the Magisterium, although linked to it obviously.

Here is how Vatican II explains the doctrine of infallibility in the teaching authority of the Church.

"Although the individual bishops do not enjoy the prerogative of infallibility, they can nevertheless proclaim Christ’s doctrine infallibly. This is so, even when they are dispersed around the world, provided that while maintaining the bond of unity among themselves and with Peter’s successor, and while teaching authentically on a matter of faith or morals, they concur in a single viewpoint as the one which must be held conclusively. This authority is even more clearly verified when, gathered together in an ecumenical council, they are teachers and judges of faith and morals for the universal Church. Their definitions must then be adhered to with the submission of faith"
(Lumen Gentium 25).

221 posted on 01/23/2004 7:36:08 PM PST by Pelayo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Pelayo; over3Owithabrain
This may come as a colossal surprise for you but the doctrine of infallibility doesn't ONLY apply to the Pope, it also applies to the whole Magisterium in Communion with the Pope.

It might come as a colossal surprise to you to learn that I know very well, and knew many years before you were born, what the doctrine of infallibility involves. Your snotty attitude of superiority is misguided.

What isn't a surprise to me is your penchant to dance and wiggle around the facts. Let's review the original question and your response:

(over3.....) Tell me, is the pope's infallibility merely "cultural" too?

And your response: "No I believe it is scriptural (Luke 10:16, Matt. 18:18)."

Please note the question specifically stated the infallibility of the Pope. Your response was to that specific question.

Your dancing and spinning that it includes the Magisterium fools no one.

Pay attention! ;-)

222 posted on 01/24/2004 9:26:56 AM PST by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Please note the question specifically stated the infallibility of the Pope. Your response was to that specific question.

Your dancing and spinning that it includes the Magisterium fools no one.

Pay attention! ;-)

That is the manner in which I argue. The question of Papal Infallibility requires an understanding of the doctrine of infallibility in the Magisterium. As I said they are linked, but they are technically separate questions. Once you demonstrate the nature of infallibility in the teaching authority of the Church, the specific infallibility of the head of that teaching authority who was commanded by Christ to "Confirm the faith of your brothers," becomes a little more obvious.

I was employing a form of reverse socratic method of argumentation. I was setting up an argument for the scriptural nature of the Pope's infallibility by getting over30 to ask the right questions (i.e. “But that would not specifically apply to one man but the whole group of apostles, not Peter specifically.”)

I can set up an arguments any way I wish. Your complaint of my method doesn't disprove my point that the infallibility of the Pope, is connected to the infallibility of all the Magisterium which IS scriptural. Thus, the Pope's special Charism of infallibility is really just a logical outgrowth of the need for unity amongst the Princes of the Church, and attested to by Christ in other parts of the Bible. It might be said that the Pope's infallibility rests on the infallibility of the Magisterium, however that infallibility rests on unity of the Bishops with the Pope.

223 posted on 01/24/2004 11:17:41 AM PST by Pelayo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-223 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson