To: liberallyconservative; BulletBobCo; BurbankKarl
I don't know much about radar - perhaps these more knowledgeable posters I'm pinging can help - I'm curious about the plane going completely off radar at 4000 feet - does that mean it blew up?
6,022 posted on
01/03/2004 7:36:12 PM PST by
LikeLight
( ___________________________________ it's a line)
To: LikeLight
Anybody got a link to the earlier story on this that talked about the debris field? If memory serves, the article cited said there had not been any large portions of the plane recovered at that time; only thousands of smaller pieces were seen.
6,026 posted on
01/03/2004 7:43:48 PM PST by
liberallyconservative
(Im a politician which means Im a cheat & a liar. If Im not kissin babies Im stealin their lollipops)
To: LikeLight
Going off the radar at 4000 feet doesn't necessarily mean that it blew up. Some radar lose the signal at a minimum altitude, depending on location between the radar and the target and whatever obstacle that could be in the way to block the return of the signal.
To: LikeLight
blew up or broke up...!
![](http://www.vistagroupusa.com/cap1.jpg)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson