[jstolzen]

OK, gang..who here thinks that the 2/1 - 2/4 nuke threat against NYC is real? And who thinks it is psyops or just wild 'net BB posts?

Also - I can't decipher homelandsecurity.com for the life of me. They put up different things that don't neccessarily seem related, and don't clearly indicate what threat is from which site or AQ statement, etc. So, you read pieces and parts of it, and come away with a "general" feeling that there are many threats, but have no way to get a good handle on their validity or what exactly was said - by whom, when and where.

I'm aware of MERI's interpretation of recent statements and Website postings, but what do you guys all think the "real" threat is at this point?

[oceanview]

i'll vote: its not real.

why didn't they detontate it last night during the times square event?

[angkor]

who here thinks that the 2/1 - 2/4 nuke threat against NYC is real?

Can't tell whether it's "real" or not, but the consequences of such an attack would be catastrophic and devastating to any nation or person aligned with Islam.

The entirety of the non-Muslim world would view Islamic nations and individuals as an immediate threat, to be dealt with in the most severe and unambiguous terms. The reaction would be savage, unremitting, and final. And I mean nuclear. Pakistan's nukes will be vaporized. The "Arab" oilfields will be seized. In the US, the vast majority of Muslims would be forcibly incarcerated or worse.

There will be no Caliphate, anywhere, ever. These Islamist animals would become the bane of all human civilation, and be exterminated without mercy.

[JustPiper]

Straight up?

Nuke in NY if anything 2-1

Simultaenous germ bombs LA

I'm starting to believe the attack I expected on SA being annihilated is all a front now, anyone else thing SA is part of this axis of what I now call 'jihad bluff'?