Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUST IN: Obama Judge Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order in Third Ruling Since Supreme Court Decision Restricting Nationwide Injunctions
Gateway Pundit ^ | July 25, 2025 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 07/25/2025 3:43:09 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

A federal judge on Friday blocked President Trump’s birthright citizenship order in a third ruling since the Supreme Court restricted nationwide injunctions.

US District Judge Leo Sorokin, an Obama appointee, blocked President Trump’s executive order nationwide.

Sorokin’s ruling comes after another district court and a three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Trump’s birthright citizenship order.

The US Supreme Court recently restricted lower courts from issuing nationwide injunctions.

The AP reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; 91to0; arrestandexecute; arrestleosorokin; birthrightcitizens; dmassachusetts; enemycombatant; enemyjudge; judgewatch; judicialsedition; judicialtreason; leosorokin; leotsorokin; noauthority; obamajudge; obamastooge; stoogewatch; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: dadgum

The left does not understand this concept. My parents were children during Mussolini and came to this country in the 50s. They were both fully naturalized citizens when they got married and then they had me that is why I am an American citizen. They were naturalized citizens before they had me

I know you all know that I just had to hear myself say it I had to see myself say it. They’re both gone now, but they were the most proud Americans you ever meet. My dad saved the newspaper clipping that announced. He and my mom had become citizens and he had it hanging up in his office to his dying day.


21 posted on 07/25/2025 4:14:41 PM PDT by Uversabound (Might does not make right, but it does enforce the commonly recognized rights of each succeeding gen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

“He was appointed by W. No surprise he is a Wuss.”

Well at least W got one right with Alito.


22 posted on 07/25/2025 4:14:54 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Article III of the Constitution gives Congress the power to “ordain and establish” inferior (lower) federal courts. This means Congress decides whether these courts exist and their basic structure.


23 posted on 07/25/2025 4:15:43 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

“It’s in the Constitution”

Then cite the passage.


24 posted on 07/25/2025 4:16:07 PM PDT by TexasGator (There is no Sharknado system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

The House is responsible for the jurisdiction and scope of the individual courts, which means the House can remove a judge’s power altogether by redistricting him/her to an irrelevant or even non-existent venue.

It has been done before. For the legal stuff,
see: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF10669/IF10669.2.pdf


25 posted on 07/25/2025 4:16:31 PM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

Can you imagine where we would be if Garland had gotten on the Court?


26 posted on 07/25/2025 4:16:59 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

“Article III of the Constitution gives Congress “

Congress is composed of two bodies, the Senate and the House of Representatives.


27 posted on 07/25/2025 4:17:31 PM PDT by TexasGator (There is no Sharknado system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I would ignore this ruling in its nationwide implication.

I would treat it as only effective in the District where it was decided and announce that you are intending to obey the Supreme Court Ruling.


28 posted on 07/25/2025 4:18:08 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

The House composes, the Senate confirms. Just like spending.


29 posted on 07/25/2025 4:19:00 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Don W

“The House is responsible for the jurisdiction and scope of the individual courts, which means the House can remove a judge’s power altogether by redistricting him/her to an irrelevant or even non-existent venue.

It has been done before. For the legal stuff,”

Nowhere does it say the House has that power.


30 posted on 07/25/2025 4:21:37 PM PDT by TexasGator (There is no Sharknado system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

How to remove a sitting SCOTUS judge...

Roberts needs to go, and these rogue circuit judges harnessed...

In the meantime, President Trump needs to ignore the rogues and follow the Supreme Court’s ruling...


31 posted on 07/25/2025 4:22:37 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

In the USSC ruling, they did say that District Courts’ class action opinions could issue nationwide injunctions.

All three of these courts have certified the affected persons as a class - which they are.

This is a stupid controversy. Amendment XIV mandates birthright citizenship by any reasonable interpretation and a Constitutional amendment will be required to do away with it.


32 posted on 07/25/2025 4:23:49 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Seems to me that DJT can react to such rulings by saying “the Supreme Court has recently ruled that such actions are illegal and,as a result,we’ll be ignoring it until the Supreme Court itself confirms its legitimacy”.


33 posted on 07/25/2025 4:25:28 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Obama ...er...Dorkbama Judge is an oxymoron.


34 posted on 07/25/2025 4:25:52 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

“The House composes, the Senate confirms. Just like spending.”

Only required for spending.


35 posted on 07/25/2025 4:26:36 PM PDT by TexasGator (There is no Sharknado system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
”The US Supreme Court recently restricted lower courts from issuing nationwide injunctions.”

And yet they continue to do so. Until there are consequences for it, would there be any reason for them to stop?

36 posted on 07/25/2025 4:30:11 PM PDT by cross_bearer_02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It would take a Constitutional Amendment to change this....and that’s not going to happen. What they can do though is NOT count illegals in a census. And a new census should be done ASAP.


37 posted on 07/25/2025 4:36:10 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cross_bearer_02

This ruling we are discussing was specifically ALLOWED by the Supreme Court in their recent decision.

They will bring an end to this issue in the Fall term.


38 posted on 07/25/2025 4:38:57 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

What can be said?
Communist and Nazi judges undermine any remaining respect for the judiciary. And the law

When the inevitable consequences arrive — perfidious criminal judges will be at or near the top of the shopping list. Alas, none of us will be able to stop it


39 posted on 07/25/2025 4:39:07 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telescope115

Enough already! If the judges are going to ignore Supreme Court rulings, then Trump just needs to ignore the idiot judges! Let the judges CHOKE on their illegal rulings. They’re making fools out of the administration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.....
Where’s Stephen Miller? Trump needs to simply ignore any judgement that is not in compliance with decisions of the Supreme Court.


40 posted on 07/25/2025 4:41:13 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (President Trump is America's long-awaited SUPREME Commander in Chief. Deus Hoc Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson