Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls for Fox News to Fire Mark Levin Over ‘Extremely Sick and Disturbing’ Post About Her on X
Gateway Pundit ^ | June 24, 2025 | Cassandra MacDonald

Posted on 06/24/2025 3:38:05 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is calling on Fox News to fire Mark Levin over an “extremely sick and disturbing” post about her on X. The two conservative stars have been locked in battle this week over U.S. involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran.

In an interview on OAN’s The Matt Gaetz Show over the weekend, Greene said, “I can’t believe that Fox News allows one of their hosts to go around and call me names on his social media. That is so unprofessional and it really speaks to what kind of media company Fox News is.”

Greene continued, “Mark Levin, obviously, he was a NeverTrumper from the beginning. He hated Donald Trump. He was totally against him and tried to stop him from becoming president, but yet now somehow Mark Levin is the voice of MAGA? I don’t think so, Matt. You and I, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, all of us have been fighting hard to stay on these America First policies and stay out of foreign wars. We’re MAGA, we’re the voice of MAGA, and the people totally agree with us. So, you know, it doesn’t matter what Mark Levin actually has to say. People don’t watch his show. I don’t know anyone that watches his show, and his screeching is absolutely unbearable, but I think Fox News needs to reel him in, although I won’t expect much out of them.”

The congresswoman concluded, “I think that’s a media company that would love to share propaganda on their network all day long because it brings in the views. Nothing like scaring the American people with another foreign war to get people to watch the news 24 hours a day.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: americalastneocons; angryneoconsbelow; ceasefire; circularfiringsquad; concerntroll; concerntrolling; expelmtg; fakewaypundit; firemarklevin; foxnews; frantisemiticcult; frisraelcult; gaywaypundit; iran; israel; johnboltonfanclub; machoantimagaman; machocuckman; machofaggotman; machomuslimman; marjoriegreene; marjorietaylorgreene; marklenin; marklevin; marxlenin; mossadfrposters; mossadishereatfr; mtg; mtgaryanwoman; mullahloversonfr; neoconcowboy; netanyahuworshippers; nevertrumperlevin; noforeignwars; nowar4israel; onlyisraelmatters; rop; snarklenin; stayoutdabushes; trump; waronterror; youmustworshipisrael; zionazi; zottheantisemites; zottheisraelfirsters; zotthemuslimlovers; zottheneocons; zotthisidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: Jamestown1630

Spoken like a true Deep Stater.


21 posted on 06/24/2025 3:51:03 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Maybe they BOTH think too much of themselves.


22 posted on 06/24/2025 3:51:18 PM PDT by unread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

I your little mind. Hs does not “always rant”.

You dont even listen.


23 posted on 06/24/2025 3:51:59 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

I’ve been called worse.

Try harder.


24 posted on 06/24/2025 3:52:09 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

He is not showing that support now. He’s trying to use Trump to further his agenda.


25 posted on 06/24/2025 3:52:33 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

We need more balanced posts like this. Thank you.


26 posted on 06/24/2025 3:53:15 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MotorCityBuck

I vote they both go away.

👍


27 posted on 06/24/2025 3:53:23 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

How do you know what I do?


28 posted on 06/24/2025 3:54:19 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

get off the phone you dope


29 posted on 06/24/2025 3:54:39 PM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Mark Levin is a charlatan.


30 posted on 06/24/2025 3:55:11 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
Note to Rep. Greene: Read up on the Supreme Court's ruling in Sullivan v. New York Times (1964).

23.
The general proposition that freedom of expression upon public questions is secured by the First Amendment has long been settled by our decisions. The constitutional safeguard, we have said,

was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people...

The maintenance of the opportunity for free political discussion to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes may be obtained by lawful means, an opportunity essential to the security of the Republic, is a fundamental principle of our constitutional system...

(I)t is a prized American privilege to speak one's mind, although not always with perfect good taste, on all public institutions...

and this opportunity is to be afforded for 'vigorous advocacy' no less than 'abstract discussion.'

The First Amendment, said Judge Learned Hand, 'presupposes that right conclusions are more likely to be gathered out of a multitude of tongues, than through any kind of authoritative selection.

To many this is, and always will be, folly; but we have staked upon it our all.' Mr. Justice Brandeis, in his concurring opinion in Whitney v. California, gave the principle its classic formulation:

24.
Those who won our independence believed...

that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of the American government. They recognized the risks to which all human institutions are subject.

But they knew that order cannot be secured merely through fear of punishment for its infraction; that it is hazardous to discourage thought, hope and imagination;

that fear breeds repression; that repression breeds hate; that hate menaces stable government;

that the path of safety lies in the opportunity to discuss freely supposed grievances and proposed remedies; and that the fitting remedy for evil counsels is good ones.

Believing in the power of reason as applied through public discussion, they eschewed silence coerced by law—the argument of force in its worst form. Recognizing the occasional tyrannies of governing majorities, they amended the Constitution so that free speech and assembly should be guaranteed.

25.
Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.

It's a shame how the institutions of public discourse have turned away from holding government accountable and towards silencing the critics of government.

-PJ

31 posted on 06/24/2025 3:55:20 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

another bish fight


32 posted on 06/24/2025 3:55:42 PM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Sounds like a fight at a late Saturday night cookout at Lake Del Boca Vista after an afternoon on the beer barge.

They should both go in the lagoon.


33 posted on 06/24/2025 3:55:45 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Mark Levin is Israel first, America second. Levin is not shy about disagreeing with Trump he feels like it, but if Levin has ever disagreed with or criticized Netanyahu about anything, I missed it.


34 posted on 06/24/2025 3:55:46 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

I don’t need to try harder. You did it for me. You outed yourself as a reprehensible person. Good job.


35 posted on 06/24/2025 3:55:59 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: boycott

:)


36 posted on 06/24/2025 3:59:27 PM PDT by MotorCityBuck (Keep the change, you are filthy animal !!s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Yep, BOTH NEED TO DRY UPVAND GO AWAY.


37 posted on 06/24/2025 4:00:14 PM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO ODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kempster

Does anyone watch it tho? I don’t enjoy any show, especially on the weekends, when it feels like I’m being lectured to or yelled at.


38 posted on 06/24/2025 4:00:56 PM PDT by Prince of Space (Trump 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Go to Levins webpage. Self promotion galore. The layout is not user friendly at all. It’s all over the place. Did he build it in his basement?

When he’s not calling half his audience Pewtins Puppets, he’s going after other talk show hosts for not being as smart as he. He wasn’t always this bad. I stopped listening last year.


39 posted on 06/24/2025 4:01:04 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Personally, I’ve never cared for Levin at all. He seems like a miserable old man. Never laughs, never smiles, everything is negative. The man could ruin a child’s birthday party.

Couldn’t care less if I never heard his high-pitched whiney gratng voice again


40 posted on 06/24/2025 4:01:25 PM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson