They are not on the right.
Trump was elected to get us out of wars not into wars.
I support Israel. I pray for their victory over Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran.
This is not America’s war and we should stay out of it. People elected Trump to stay out of war period.
Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of the Jewish News Syndicate, a senior contributor for The Federalist, a columnist for Newsweek and a contributor to many other publications. He covers the American political scene, foreign policy, the U.S.-Israel relationship, Middle East diplomacy, the Jewish world and the arts...
Pro-Iran my foot. You guys are being so over the top you’re ruining your own case.
It’s not quite right. They’re not Pro-Iran Rightists. They’re Pro-Russian rightists. Iran is an ally of Russia and thus they are against anything that hurts Iran. If it was the other way around, they’d be all for the death and destruction and talking about monarchy and how the US should be a dictatorship that kills its own people.
An update of the ol’ fallacy of “If you don’t want the US to go to war for country A against country B, you must be anti-country A and pro-country B”.
Thanks for posting this, WM.
I find it quite comical, that most of the people here who accuse others of being “pro-[some other country] stooges” or “bots” are recent arrivals on FR (10-20 years or more after me). Some of those most prone to posting ‘tunnel vision’ tabloid/3rd world spam and insulting others are real newbies, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they were paid propagandists (minimum wage category ;^) for countries like Ukraine...
<< Tucker-gang fake Anti war >>
True. Most of em would support going to war against Israel in a nonosecond.
Oh look, JEWISH News Service. Anti-War is not Pro-Iran.
I don’t know any anti Israel, pro Iran on the right. Maybe close to 100% of the left.
Since when is minding our own business “isolationist”?
Fallacy of the false dilemma. We don’t have to align with either side.
Being anti-involvement in a middle east conflict someone else started without consulting you doesn’t mean you’re pro-Iran.
When it comes to Israel, Tucker is ambivalent or worse. Let’s not forget that a sizeable portion of the Democratic party is anti-Israel. Tucker is very moderate by comparison.
Sometime back, Tucker identified three flash-points that could lead to WWIII: Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan. That sounds reasonable. He said US interests were only affected in the case of Taiwan.
I think Tucker and Jeffrey Sachs have the facts that NATO expansion has taken place and it would be reasonable for Russia to see it as a threat.
How Tucker can be ambivalent about Jews and Muslims is a mystery to me. How many Christian nations were conquered by Muslims in the middle east? Isn’t Muslim conquest taking place through immigration in Europe and the US today? What are the tenets of the respective religions? Jefferson knew and formed the Marines, sending them to Tripoli. They went to fight Muslims, not Jews.
I can hope that the current fighting in Iran will topple the Ayatollahs and begin to undo the damage caused by Jimmy Carter in 1979.
The fact is...... Tucker really doesn’t matter.
Tucker is nw a trivial has been
Tobin is absolutely right. When this is over Tucker and Bannon are going to look like fools. There’s a reason why neither one of them is President.
But, Charlie Kirk, MTG, Greg Kelly and others wary of us getting involved directly in this war are not.
Most of the base wants Israel to takeout Iran's nuclear capability without us going to war with Iran. And, for good reason.