Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This is great šŸ‘
1 posted on 04/06/2025 6:07:25 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Macho MAGA Man

Congress needs to get a spine and actually do something. This seems very doable.


2 posted on 04/06/2025 6:10:12 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Don’t recall hearing if this has been done previously, but it’s high time. I suppose the Senate would need to concur.


3 posted on 04/06/2025 6:13:13 PM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (ā€œā€¦all who were appointed for eternal life believed.ā€ Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

As a member of the Peanut Gallery, I’m in 100%.
The Judge looks like a Deep State operative from here.


6 posted on 04/06/2025 6:14:29 PM PDT by 55Ford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Yes! MC like.


7 posted on 04/06/2025 6:14:54 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Roberts has at least given tacit approval to everything Boasberg has done. He could stop this shiite with a single phone call.


8 posted on 04/06/2025 6:15:08 PM PDT by ComputerGuy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man; Sequoyah101

So now, we can impeach judges and get them removed by a simply majority in the Senate?


11 posted on 04/06/2025 6:17:02 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (FBI out of Florida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

You can’t do that. Boasberg will put a TRO on Congress too.


12 posted on 04/06/2025 6:18:21 PM PDT by hardspunned (Look for theā€œPutin Stoogeā€ libel, news from Ukraine you’ve gradually grown to trust over 36 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Resolutions do nothing.

Resolutions are used by Congress to express opinions, sentiments, or decisions on matters within its own authority. They are often used for internal housekeeping, commemorating events, honoring individuals, or stating the position of Congress on a particular issue.


14 posted on 04/06/2025 6:22:09 PM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I’m never going to call impotent grandstanding or virtue signaling brave or great no matter who does it or no matter what the reason is.


21 posted on 04/06/2025 6:32:19 PM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

DO IT!


27 posted on 04/06/2025 6:50:51 PM PDT by kenmcg (ti hi o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Biggs is running for Gov. in Az in ā€˜26. He has my vote!!!


28 posted on 04/06/2025 6:55:28 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

This is how the Congress is supposed to act. Congress will certainly let the Article III Judges know what lane they are required, by statutes, to stay in.

If not, then the Congress is in on this Judicial coup!!


29 posted on 04/06/2025 6:57:42 PM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

“”...failing to uphold the Constitution’s ā€œgood behaviorā€ clause...””

Yes, having a major conflict of interest (his daughter’s gig), yet insisting on ruling over the case anyway is definitely judicial ‘bad behavior’.


30 posted on 04/06/2025 7:06:18 PM PDT by Danie_2023
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man
This is great

Maybe...until the Dems decide to use it against judges and justices they don't like.

Turtle warned Democrats they'd regret overturning the judicial filibuster for lower court nominees, and he was right. Because when the Republicans got into power, they expanded that policy to apply to the Supreme Court as well, and that was a disaster for the Democrats.

The GOP trying to bypass the impeachment process to get rid of a piddly district court judge is just plain stupid. It'd come back to bite us in the ass, only much harder, the next time the Democrats control Congress.

32 posted on 04/06/2025 7:16:21 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

There is no law to support this silliness.


33 posted on 04/06/2025 7:19:20 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Biggs is running for governor in Arizona. He has my support.


39 posted on 04/06/2025 7:41:20 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Yeah, but good luck getting even a majority in the Senate with all the Rino’s. Unless that can be bypassed as well.


49 posted on 04/07/2025 12:19:01 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The only way to remove him is to impeach him or eliminate his court.


52 posted on 04/07/2025 5:31:45 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson