Posted on 03/11/2025 4:24:23 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
The Biden Autopen scandal is growing by the day.
The Oversight Project released new analysis of Biden’s pardons for family members, Dr. Tony Fauci, General Milley, J6 Committee members and Gerald Lundergan.
On January 19, 2025, just one day before Trump was set to be sworn in as the 47th US President, Joe Biden issued a flurry of pardons to his family members, Fauci and others.
The Oversight Project determined that all of the pardons issued on January 19 had the same exact Biden autopen signature.
WATCH:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
BRING ON THE ARRESTS!!!
If its all autopen it makes everything that was ever signed null and void
20 million ghost voters endorsed this signing.
“”” Joe Biden issued a flurry of pardons to his family members, Fauci and others.”””
They spelled HUNTER Biden wrong.
They’ll just get Biden to say, his hand hurt he couldn’t sign it.
This one isn’t going to get us what we want. Plus SCOTUS would never allow it.
“BRING ON THE ARRESTS!!!”
Wake me up OK?
They need to get someone to confess for it to have a chance in court. Biden can say he was there ‘observing ‘.
‘Joe’s as sharp as a tack’ comes back to bite the Biden crime family in the buttocks.
Those auto penned pardons are worthless.
gotta wonder if SOMEBODY didn’t just open the door to the oval office and let anyone and everyone have access to the “magic pardon pen”, for a price, and anyone who could afford it could write their own pardon. apparently some couldn’t afford the price.
In May 2011 while attending the G8 summit in France, Barack Obama became the first president to use the autopen in order to sign the expiring Patriot act. In November of that year, he signed an appropriations bill with the autopen from Indonesia, and in 2013, Obama used the autopen yet again from Hawaii in order to meet the deadline for signing the fiscal cliff bill into law several time zones over in Washington, D.C. Though there were rumblings from the Republican camp, the constitutional right of the president to sign a bill with the autopen has neither been challenged nor tested in court.
The constitutionality of a proxy signature has most certainly been challenged, with some legal experts asserting that the problem is not the use of a proxy, but that the principal (in this case, the president) and the proxy (the autopen) are not together at the time of signing.
Presidents have long used “secretarial signatures” - meaning a secretary was authorized to actually sign the president’s name to documents. No one has ever questioned this.
I don’t see an autopen as being that much different.
Don’t get me wrong. There probably is a scandal attached to Biden’s autopen uses. He might not have even been aware of many of them. I just don’t see it going anywhere.
something doesn’t always have to “go somewhere” for the People to take notice.
But, what can he use as his reason for not signing himself? His hands seem to work fine. His brain is another story. He can’t say he was physically incapable of signing, but mentally....mmmmmm....conundrum for Joe.
Not if he was in the Virgin Islands while the pardons were specifically stated to be signed in DC.
Somebody needs to subpoena all the communications records. For Biden to approve these there would have to be some means of communication used.
Autopen + dementia patient = rogue unelected (illegal) government.
That’s how I read it.
I like Gateway Pundit but seems there reporting goes unnoticed.
No, it doesn't.
Presidents have been using autopen signatures on everything from autographs to actual legislation since at least Harry S. Truman.
This is one of those fake Griftway Pundit conspiracies that makes our side look like retards.
Are there rules regarding the auto pen?
wake me for the perp walks.. I’ll probably still be napping waiting for the epstine files.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.