So this clearly WAS NOT a result of lack of rainfall or any other climate-related cause, it HAD TO BE the result of mismanagement.
If the dems solve the problem, there is no reason to continue to hire them.
“The rising frequency of extreme weather events, from devastating wildfires to catastrophic floods and hurricanes...”
No need to dive in more into this horse manure.
Once the last word is said …… the environmentally-ill will be responsible therefore all will be denied.
Great article! This creates an excellent response to lefties arguing that, as expected, “climate change” is leading to extreme weather events.
It also raises the specter of self-fulfilling prophesies. They say climate change causes wildfires, but then they cut the fire prevention budget, and then point to the ensuing extreme fires as “proof” they are correct about climate change.
Let us remember, the natives who lived in this area moved from the mountains to the beaches 3, 4, or even 500 years ago. Climate change? I think not.
Great points!
Good thinking, well written.
are both compelling and dire.
No. No they are not.
You assume that their “climat change” hokum is real and then you point out the hypocrisy in their funding goals and objectives.
We have spent trillions in adressing this phantom and it needs to just stop.
All funding and efforts directed towards climate change should be frozen world wide, and then redirected to a new challenge, one of a more immediate practical necessity.
This new challenge is to come up with a method of describing, in concise terms and with great precision, focusing on cause and effect, empirical data and timelines of events, just how stupid the democrats and their globalist puppetmasters are.
—that of describing in as concise terms as possible just how stupid the democrats, communists and all globalists
Fire Preparedness:An EV in every garage, before the Palisades Fire.
these criminals feel more comfortable
losing all water,
handing out gasoline and get-out-of-jail cards to terrorists,
stopping all fire insurance,
and enjoying the fire atrocity from a foreign country.
The climate change activists are just like the zero covidians. They have no plans, just orders as to what they think should be done. When their orders backfire, they run to hills to regroup.
There is NO climate crisis. Hurricane’s haven’t gotten more powerful or more frequent. Total BS.
Is it getting warmer? Seems to be but like anything it’s cyclic. Antarctic has a far larger ice shelf than 10 years ago.https://www.cambridge.org/core/blog/2021/04/14/nasa-study-excess-of-mass-gains-of-the-antarctic-ice-sheet-over-mass-losses-during-1992-to-2008-eliminated-by-increasing-dynamic-losses-to-2016/
There’s no increase in remote wildfires either but man made wildfires are increasing...arsonist and dumb ass people are the main problem. Then there’s power lines and other engineering disasters causing problems.
So no climate crisis jus idiots causing problems.
We cannot change climate!
Climate changes itself, and getting warmer or having more lifegiving CO2 in the atmosphere are not bad things!
But we can prepare and adjust for the change!
Scientific forest management and fire preparedness are significant part of this process.
Because they NEED disasters to push their false claims....
The very first thing to annoy the left is to quit using their narrative, AKA “climate change.” We should always refer to it as “global warming” as it was decades ago, this has ticked the left off so much they had to adopt another term.
- - - - - - - - - -
change /CHānj/
verb
1. make (someone or something) different; alter or modify.
“both parties voted against proposals to change the law”
2. replace (something) with something else, especially something of the same kind that is newer or better; substitute one thing for (another).
“she decided to change her name”
noun 1.
the act or instance of making or becoming different.
- - - - - - - - - -
Much like the term ‘transgender’ is used as there is no such thing in reality. Carry on!
On the climate front: Way back when, as in the early 1970's the hoax was global cooling, we were all going to freeze to death and/or starve because no crops would grow.
Later, when that boogie man was found to be a lie a new one mysteriously showed up, named global warming. This boogie man didn't function well or for long. So the name was changed to climate change. This term doesn't make distinctions of any kind. Therefore, it can mean whatever the creators of the boogie men need and the gullible buy in.
For proof? This article sets it out there for us to tear all these boogie men apart. If there creators thought these boogie men were real, They Would Have Been Preparing For Them For The Last Fifty Years. Therefore, none of it is real, it's just one hoax following another.
The fires are just the beginning, once the environmentalists get involved it will be a nightmare. Most of this charred land will be labeled “toxic”, in fact touching or clearing the debris will first require soil samples, then expensive and lengthy remediation. Some of the land might have to sit for years, the environmental bureaucracy will be stifling.
How much of that claimed climate warming mix of gases and chemicals has been dumped into the atmosphere by the anti climate warming emptying of reservoirs, destruction of dams, and refusal to replenish water supply? Dies preserving the habitat of bait fish help save the earth from climate warming when it causes the lack of fire fighting water in LA?
So this clearly WAS NOT a result of lack of rainfall or any other climate-related cause, it HAD TO BE the result of mismanagement.