Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhaNiF5aCCY&t=6s

This is the best scientific explanation of why we'll never get the exact candidate we want. If he's perfect for us then 60 percent of the voting electorate views him as poison. Great presentation.

1 posted on 11/16/2024 1:30:58 PM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather

I don’t know, I’m pretty happy with the candidate we got!


2 posted on 11/16/2024 1:39:46 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they. control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather

Sounds interesting.

But, I will not watch a 24 minute video to hear the explanation.
Not directed at you or anyone else. Just my personal opinion.
I hate the emphasis on video presentations.

Yeah, I’m an old fart that reads about 500-600 wpm. Even much faster if I’m looking for the main point.

I simply don’t have time to listen to rambling presentations on every subject that might interest me.

However, I’m quite certain my rant isn’t going to change anything. But, it felt good to vent that frustration.

Thanks for reading!


3 posted on 11/16/2024 1:45:52 PM PST by sjmjax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather

*WE* are the 60++ percent, and we got exactly the candidate we wanted.


6 posted on 11/16/2024 1:49:43 PM PST by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather

You said:

This is the best scientific explanation of why we’ll never get the exact candidate we want. If he’s perfect for us then 60 percent of the voting electorate views him as poison. Great presentation.

And:

This is the best scientific explanation of why we’ll never get the exact candidate we want. If he’s perfect for us then 60 percent of the voting electorate views him as poison. Great presentation.

So, if I’m correct, you’re saying:

This is the best scientific explanation of why we’ll never get the exact candidate we want. If he’s perfect for us then 60 percent of the voting electorate views him as poison. Great presentation.

That about sum it up?


7 posted on 11/16/2024 2:04:30 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather

“This is the best scientific explanation of why we’ll never get the exact candidate we want.”

Junk science - and the author should speak for himself - because I got the candidate I wanted in 12 out of 19 races - the ones I didn’t want are followed by an X.

1952 Eisenhower
1956 Eisenhower
1960 Nixon
1964 Goldwater
1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Ford X
1980 Reagan
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush X
1992 Bush X
1996 Dole
2000 Bush X
2004 Bush X
2008 McCain X
2012 Romney X
2016 Trump
2020 Trump
2024 Trump

12 out of 19 - I’d say that’s a pretty solid lifetime record, and if I live long enough, I suspect I’ll get the candidate I want twice more (Vance).


11 posted on 11/16/2024 2:45:50 PM PST by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather
There is no such thing as "perfect". There are only acceptable levels of imperfection.

Once you accept that you have begun to move from being a child into an adult mind set.

The world is imperfect and messy.

Deal with it.

13 posted on 11/16/2024 2:57:33 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Not my circus. Not my monkeys. But I can pick out the clowns at 100 yards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson