You said:
This is the best scientific explanation of why we’ll never get the exact candidate we want. If he’s perfect for us then 60 percent of the voting electorate views him as poison. Great presentation.
And:
This is the best scientific explanation of why we’ll never get the exact candidate we want. If he’s perfect for us then 60 percent of the voting electorate views him as poison. Great presentation.
So, if I’m correct, you’re saying:
This is the best scientific explanation of why we’ll never get the exact candidate we want. If he’s perfect for us then 60 percent of the voting electorate views him as poison. Great presentation.
That about sum it up?
I tried to condense a very good presentation, and I left a lot out. William Spaniel is well worth your time if you have an interest in how and why things work the way they do.