Multiple ironies here.
One, I basically made this point last week.
Two, the media has ignored this completely.
Three, the harris sycophants - and she herself - claim DJT will do the same himself.
...and the game continues...10 days and some 12 hours or so and counting...
Too stupid to read and understand the PDF right out of the warhorse’s mouth...
https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/524001p.pdf
“That’s flat-out not true, the Pentagon and experts on military policy told The War Horse.”
Well you can’t argue with that, clearly the claims are “misinformation.” I am so tired of that term being thrown around because the left can’t win an actual argument.
Well, if they say so...
Who is the “far-right?” They use this term like it means something. Is it just some unnamed nut case? If so, who cares what he thinks?
You didn’t get your copy of ‘Project 2025’? Its right in there. Just like abortion is in the Bill of Rights. The failed opponent’s ads are getting more and more inciteful by the day. And carville’s comment about slitting throats. Stand by for unrest.
This piece certainly didn’t leave any of the propaganda buzzwords out.
I guess this is what I would say if caught too. They probably hoped no one would notice when they slid this one in. Now they have to say something.
Anyone think they’re going to use this to remove all the human debris that FU Biden, BJ Harris, et al. allowed to cross into the USA illegally. You know the gangs, pedos, mental cases, etc.?
“...That’s flat-out not true, the Pentagon and experts on military policy told The War Horse...”
Who the H*LL is The War Horse and why would the Pentagon and “experts” jump to respond to them?????
“...That’s flat-out not true, the Pentagon and experts on military policy told The War Horse...”
Who the H*LL is The War Horse and why would the Pentagon and “experts” jump to respond to them?????
If the DOJ doesn’t anticipate that lethal force against civilians might be necessary then why even include the language in the same subsections dealing with potential unrest/threats, among them being civilians? I’m not gonna sit here and pooh-pooh the revision/update because there aren’t some things in it that lead one to want a formal in-depth discussion about what it means.
Is it untrue like “SCOTUS ruled Trump can commit all manner of crimes while President” or untrue because they just say so? I see and hear lies about Trump every day on TV, so why should I believe their denials? Um, I mean “fact checking”.
Check out the Board of Directors’ resumes, in their About page. Generally Lefty journalists, one of which “served” in the Obama administration.
Yes. It does… it literally authorizes deadly force against Americas in a declared emergency. It’s in black and white.
When local pols severely feel the pain it will stop. Not before. Protest all you want. They don’t care.
Long discussion here from the other day.
DOD DIRECTIVE 5240.01 DOD INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED ACTIVITIES AND DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE COMPONENT ASSISTANCE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND OTHER CIVIL AUTHORITIES (Revised 9/27/24)
Department of Defense ^ | 9/27/24
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4271805/posts
I do believe my reading comprehension is just fine.
You see, they NEED this. Why?
Because the police no longer have any duty to the individual or community at large.
Do Police Have a Duty To Protect Individuals?
10/25/2024, 2:42:04 PM · 30 of 33
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4273356/posts
Start putting puzzle pieces together and you realize Marital Law is coming soon. And make no mistake...all them illegals...yeah if citizens loose their minds over the election we are opening the door for the chaos to follow.
We’re days out from the election and their strategy is being revealed, hold the line folks...just hold the line. For those older FReepers who refuse to believe this is true, I am sorry but those days are long gone. It is hard to believe I know. Been on FR a long time and recall discussion that the military would never obey such orders, now? I still here comments that rank and file wouldn’t follow an unlawful order...thing again. The military has been purged and recruitment is down for a good reason.
Secretary of Defense can approve use of lethal force. 3.3.a.c, 3.5.c.1
https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/524001p.pdf
My question is if warhorse is not full of 💩 where is the proof?
Can anyone show a DOD policy quote that specifically prohibits deadly force on civilians.]?
Surely there is some lawyer here that works for the DOD.
Eli Kopter : "A rogue DOJ can take any of the laws and either twist them or disregard them.
They have proven that since Obama came into office (and accelerated under Biden-Harris).
It is possible that they can take this new rule and use it if Harris does not certify a Trump victory.
Is that the plan? Trump wins and Harris refuses to certify, and then a false flag operation begins in Washington D.C. and the Military is invoked.
She could declare Martial Law and Biden would remain President for as long as they like
(or invoke the 25th Amendment on Biden and assume leadership as a 'caretaker government')."
(From the complete article) :" Just as former president Donald Trump told Fox News last week that he wanted to use the U.S. military
to “handle” what he called the “enemy from within” on Election Day, an obscure military policy was beginning to make the rounds on social media platforms favored by the far right."
"The focus? Department of Defense Directive 5240.01.
The 22-page document governs military intelligence activities
and is among more than a thousand different policies that outline Defense Department procedures."
"The Pentagon updated it at the end of September. Although military policies are routinely updated and reissued,
the timing of this one—just six weeks before the election and the same day Hurricane Helene slammed into the Southeast—struck right-wing misinformation merchants as suspicious."
"They latched onto a new reference in the updated directive—“lethal force”—and soon were falsely claiming that the change means
Kamala Harris had authorized the military to kill civilians if there is unrest after the election."
"That’s flat-out not true, the Pentagon and experts on military policy told The War Horse."
"“The provisions in [the directive] are not new, and do not authorize the Secretary of Defense to use lethal force against U.S. citizens,
contrary to rumors and rhetoric circulating on social media,” Sue Gough, a Department of Defense spokesperson, said Wednesday night"
(Complete article as posted)