Posted on 10/03/2024 7:09:55 PM PDT by bitt
Judge Tanya Chutkan on Wednesday unsealed Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 165-page “immunity motion” arguing that Trump is subjected to presidential immunity following the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Chutkan unsealed the 165-page monstrosity to do the maximum damage to Trump before the election.
This is Jack Smith’s dirty October surprise.
Jack Smith rejected Trump’s claims of immunity and said his actions on January 6 were “private.”
“The defendant asserts that he is immune from prosecution for his criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election because, he claims, it entailed official conduct. Not so. Although the defendant was the incumbent President during the charged conspiracies, his scheme was fundamentally a private one. Working with a team of private co-conspirators, the defendant acted as a candidate when he pursued multiple criminal means to disrupt, through fraud and deceit, the government function by which votes are collected and counted—a function in which the defendant, as President, had no official role,” Jack Smith wrote in the motion reviewed by The Gateway Pundit.
Jack Smith also accused Trump of inciting a riot.
According to Jack Smith’s dossier, an unidentified Trump aide messaged, “Let them riot” and “Do it!!!” in response to a colleague suggesting there would be unrest reminiscent of the Brooks Brothers Riot.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I find this hard to believe, but I think you ought to know it exists:
https://heartland.org/opinion/heartland-rasmussen-poll-one-in-five-mail-in-voters-admit-to-committing-at-least-one-kind-of-voter-fraud-during-2020-election/
Read later.
An unidentified source? Guess we just need to take Jack’s word for it. Anybody stupid enough to trust him?
I can’t even read this stuff anymore.
The DOJ auditor report coming out post election will likely reveal that the FBI had seeded to so call riotous crowd with instigators who caused the riot to happen.
11 damning details in Jack Smith’s new brief in the Trump election case
Yes, and Smith’s still out there because the GOPee won’t get behind Trump and run Smiths ass off.
According to Jack Smith’s dossier, an unidentified Trump aide messaged, “Let them riot” and “Do it!!!” in response to a colleague suggesting there would be unrest reminiscent of the Brooks Brothers Riot.
Was the “unidentified Trump aide’s” name Nancy Pelosi?
The further analogy is: The guy you pay to pick up your curbside garbage on Fridays was seen driving drunk, therefore you, not him, are under arrest for DUI.
It’s already been established that Jack Smith was placed in his position illegally. Why is he still there?
A friggin’ Jamaican “judge”, a Jamaican prez candidate and a “BeetleJuice” remake. What the hell is going on? Is November’s election going to be the first Caribbean election for the new Socialist Colony of New Jamaica formerly known as “America”?
Thanks Candor7!
I thought “hearsay” evidence is not evidence in a court of law.
Even a kangaroo court.
Pretty much “hearsay” in a real court.
Except Trump didn’t say it, and the event referred to wasn’t a riot it was a legitimate demonstration by Cuban Americans wearing jackets and ties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.