Posted on 09/11/2024 6:35:54 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
It’s okay, ppl. Community notes on X have assured us that she was wearing a matching necklace & earring set from Tiffany & not the Nova earpiece. The necklace alone cost $18,000. See, she’s actually one of us little ppl & she understands our suffering! /s
ABC didn’t have Harris’s mic muted when Trump was answering, did they? If not, then that was a violation of the agreement, and clearly election interference also.
But how do we rebut the community notes? The images of the Tiffany’s earrings are clearly different than what Kamala was wearing. The pearl is small and embedded within metal on the Tiffany earrings. Kamala’s pearl has no metal around it and the pearls are large.
That needs to make it onto the community notes, because those are very obviously NOT the Tiffany earrings they are trying to claim.
You really don’t remember how much the Democrats hated GWB? He had a shoe thrown at him at a press conference on foreign soil while he was POTUS. In 2005, someone threw a live grenade at him while he was giving a speech in the country of Georgia. The assassin pulled the pin but had wrapped a handkerchief around the grenade so that the safety lever couldn’t fall off. I don’t even remember hearing about that attempt. As late as 2022, the FBI found a plot to assassinate him even though he hadn’t been president for over two decades.
Thank you for posting that image. In that image the pearl is so embedded it doesn’t even look like a pearl. Totally different than what Kamala wore.
Are you able to post some of those images of the pearl earrings she’s worn before? I think it was Daily Caller that had an article claiming that she’s worn these specific earrings before - without giving any substantiation for the claim. Seeing what you’ve got could clarify things a bit.
I challenge whatever trolls put “crazy conspiracy kooks”, etc in the keywords for this post to actually address the evidence that’s been brought up.
LOOKED LIKE A DANGLING EARRINGS TO ME.
MAYBE THE DANGLE WAS ADDED TO CONFUSE.
Yes, that too would be considered election interference.
Saying yes would be even better for business, but they can’t say that because getting on the wrong side of the Deep State cabal can be fatal.
Saying no could actually get them a lot of perks from that cabal. I’m quite surprised they didn’t deny it, even if it was their product.
I imagine both Trump and Harris had one on last night
That is bs
If she’s double-pierced it would make sense for her to have two earrings on, to make it appear different than the Novo earrings. Somebody (meyer?) also noted that her right ear was never visible. (I’m allergic to lies so I didn’t watch) If that is the case she could have any earring or combination on her left ear which was visible and hidden a Novo earring on the right ear. She would only need to have the 2 ears look similar enough that it wouldn’t raise suspicions if her hair somehow moved enough to let the right ear be seen. The commenter mentioned that her hair seemed glued into place on the right side.
Somebody else (foldspace?) also mentioned that there seemed to be times when she wasn’t speaking because she was listening.
If that could be shown clearly it would be really helpful.
Also, the images you have of the 2 sets of pearl-like earrings she’s worn before would also be helpful.
I’m no jeweler, but if I had the tools and a Novo device, I could make it look like a Tiffany at that resolution in about 30 minutes. Imagine what a pro could do.
FReeper challenge?
I thought she went for pearl necklaces
There are no coincidences with democrats.
That level of evil is too calculating to make those kinds of errors.
Lots of us are.
These tricks and the totally rigged "fact checks" were all pre-planned by ABC to carry out a media-style assassination of President Donald Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.