Posted on 09/05/2024 8:41:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, has determined that the antisemitic phrase “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” does not violate its hate speech policies.
The slogan has seen a resurgence in popularity amid widespread protests across the country against Israel’s military campaign against terrorist group Hamas.
Meta’s Oversight Board has found that the phrase “From the River to the Sea,” used to express Palestinian support, did not break the company’s hate speech policies.
Critics of the phrase, which refers to the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, say that it calls for the abolishment of the Israeli state. The Anti-Defamation League accused the slogan of being antisemitic and a “rallying cry (that) has long been used by anti-Israel voices, including supporters of terrorist organizations such as Hamas.”
But the chant is also frequently used at pro-Palestinian demonstrations by protesters who say it is to call for equal rights and an independent state for Palestinians. It can refer to Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza who are restricted in their movements and from visiting Jerusalem.
The Board said it reviewed three cases involving the use of “From the River to the Sea” on Facebook and said that all appeals to remove the content were closed without human review. Those users then appealed to the Board, which exists for users to challenge Meta’s appeals process on Facebook, Instagram or Threads.
The Oversight Board argued that “the three pieces of content contain contextual signs of solidarity with Palestinians – but no language calling for violence or exclusion” and “do not glorify or even refer to Hamas.”
Some on the board acknowledged that the phrase can have multiple meanings, but pointed out that it appears in Hamas’ 2017 charter.
The antisemitic Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) praised the Oversight Board’s decision, claiming that some activists use the phrase to “call for Israelis and Palestinians to live together in one state with equal rights,” and that it “does not inherently constitute hate speech.”
CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper celebrated the decision:
“We appreciate Meta recognizing that the Jewish, Palestinian and other activists who sometimes use this phrase as their way of advocating for Israelis and Palestinians to live together in one state with equal rights are not engaging in hate speech. This stands in stark contrast the official position of the Likud Party and the Israeli government, which calls for a permanent state of occupation and subjugation 'from the river to the sea' in its official platform. It is essential that Meta also take action to ensure that voices opposing the genocide in Gaza are not being unjustly censored or banned.”
Despite CAIR’s claims, the slogan has been parroted by pro-Hamas protesters on college campuses and other areas since the war in Gaza began with Hamas’ slaughter of Israeli civilians and others on Oct. 7. It has been used by Hamas and other terrorist entities to promote violence against Jews.
The slogan is a rallying cry typically used to advocate for the elimination of Jewish sovereignty in the region. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) described the phrase as a classic example of antisemitic rhetoric aimed at delegitimizing Israel’s right to exist.
It is fundamentally a call for a Palestinian state extending from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, territory that includes the state of Israel, which would mean the Jewish state being dismantlied. It is an antisemitic charge denying the Jewish right to self-determination, including through the removal of Jews from their ancestral homeland.
It is possible that some who use the phrase do not know its history or actual meaning. But most of those pushing the slogan understand precisely what it means--even if they are too cowardly to admit it publicly.
The notion that the phrase does not constitute hate speech is laughable, considering what Facebook and other Meta-owned platforms actually consider to be objectionable. It appears this move may have been aimed at quelling backlash coming from the anti-Israel crowd. But in the end, it only highlights the company’s hypocrisy in its content moderation practices.
Good. Free Speech means what it says.
Was thinking how so many fell into the Hate Speech trap.
“Hate” legislation must be eradicated.
Isn’t that ginger android who runs Facebook Jewish?
Is he a f—g idiot?!
Dear Jewish Americans- River to the sea also means the Mississippi to the Atlantic and the Pacific.
You're asking to be censored if you dare to participate in "free speech".
Calls for violence aren’t hate speech, but disagreeing with leftists is?
Its about water conservation
Right?
Because they don’t belive in free Speech for us. It shouldn’t be.
The slogan shouted by the blood-thirsty Arab terrorists as they slaughtered 1300 innocent people in their beds. Not offensive enough for meta, eh?
> Good. Free Speech means what it says. <
I understand what you’re trying to say. I really do. Free speech is the cornerstone of any decent society. Without it we have nothing, no rights at all.
But here’s the thing. There is a line. Free speech cannot advocate violence. And “from the river to the sea” advocates violence. It’s cleverly subtle, but it’s there. You cannot reach the sea until and unless you destroy the Jewish state.
Not that much different than me saying to you, “I want your property. So I will take your property. Do not stand in my way.”
Right now the Muzzies and the Left may scream “Free Palestine!” and “From the river to the sea...”, but soon they will be they will get brave enough to scream,
“KILL THE JEWS!!!”
Let’s see if the social media websites still say that isn’t screaming for genocide.
Yes, who defines what is hate?!!! You end up like the UK.
https://www.oversightboard.com/meet-the-board/
Meet Our Board Members Around the World
Afia Asantewaa Asare-Kyei
Director for Justice & Accountability, Open Society Foundations-Africa
Evelyn Aswad
Professor and Chair, University of Oklahoma College of Law
Endy Bayuni
Senior Editor and Board Member, The Jakarta Post
Paolo Carozza
Professor, University of Notre Dame
Katherine Chen
Professor, National Chengchi University
Nighat Dad
Executive Director, Digital Rights Foundation, and Lawyer
Tawakkol Karman
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
Sudhir Krishnaswamy
Vice Chancellor and Professor of Law, National Law School of India University
Ronaldo Lemos
Professor, Rio de Janeiro State University’s Law School
Khaled Mansour
Writer
Michael McConnell
Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School
Suzanne Nossel
Chief Executive Officer, PEN America
Julie Owono
Executive Director, Internet Sans Frontières
Emi Palmor
Advocate and Lecturer, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel
Alan Rusbridger
Editor, Prospect magazine
András Sajó
University Professor, Central European University
John Samples
Vice President, Cato Institute
Pamela San Martín
Former Electoral Councilor at the National Electoral Institute (INE) in Mexico
Nicolas Suzor
Professor, School of Law at Queensland University of Technology
Helle Thorning-Schmidt
Former Prime Minister, Denmark
Kenji Yoshino
Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law and Faculty Director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging
Future Appointments
To protect our independence, Board Members contract directly with the Oversight Board. They are not Meta employees and cannot be removed by the company. Most importantly, as we announced in April 2023, Meta no longer plays a role in the selection of new Board Members. We hold sole responsibility for all future appointments.
If one looks at the maps of the old Jewish lands prior to 1400 it was all Jewish and Christian in the Middle East Mediterranean. Islam was an invading force and conquered much with the sword. The real question is whose land is it today?
1.Bedouin tribes before Islam or even the Jewish faith or Islam?
2. Christian land which was all great in the Middle East many years after the death of Christ.
3. Muslim land that was taken by the sword?
From the River
To the Sea
Make Yisrael
Ham ass Free!
Meta and its boss Zuckerbutt can both go to Gehennem.
Doesn’t the hamas charter of 1988 explicitly call for the genocide of the Jews and erasure of the Israeli lands from river to river and river to the sea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.