Posted on 08/20/2024 8:35:39 AM PDT by Red Badger
Every once in a while, The New York Times accidentally publishes a brutally honest report.
Nick Coransaniti admitted on Monday in a piece for The New York Times that the new election laws in Georgia and new election integrity rules will likely cost Democrats the election.
They’re obviously telling us they cheat.
Maybe the new laws in Georgia ought to be the blueprint for saving the election and the United States from the dirty Marxists!?
As reported earlier, the Georgia Election Board has voted 3-2 in favor of a new rule mandating that election workers compare the total number of ballots cast with the total number of unique voter ID numbers in the system.
This rule aims to ensure that every vote cast in the state is legitimate and that any discrepancies are thoroughly investigated before election results can be certified.
The new rule, reported by former RNC official and Trump’s spokeswoman Liz Harrington, is set to overhaul how precincts handle election returns.
Under the rule, if discrepancies are found in any precinct—where the number of ballots exceeds the number of unique voter IDs—the counties are required to withhold certification of the election results until the suspected fraud is fully investigated and resolved.
According to the newly approved regulation, the Georgia Election Board members are tasked with scrutinizing the voting data in each precinct. Specifically, the rule stipulates:
Tabulating Results: After each election, but no later than 3 PM on the Friday following the election, the Election Board must conduct a review of precinct returns. This includes tabulating all absentee ballots, advance voting, Election Day in-person voting, and provisional ballots. The total number of unique voter IDs will then be compared with the total ballots cast in each precinct.
Investigating Discrepancies: In instances where the number of ballots cast surpasses the number of unique voter IDs, the Board is required to determine which voting method the discrepancy originated from and conduct a thorough investigation. Votes from the affected precinct will not be counted until the investigation is completed and the results are presented to the Board, as mandated by GA Code § 21-2-493(b).
Certification of Results: Once all precinct discrepancies have been investigated and corrected, the accurate returns will be recorded and verified. Only then will the consolidated returns be certified by the superintendent, with the certification deadline set at 5:00 PM on the Monday following the election. The certified returns must then be immediately transmitted to the Secretary of State.
The rule also empowers Board members to examine all election-related documentation before certifying the results, ensuring that any potential fraud is detected and addressed before the election results become official. If fraud is discovered, the Board is obligated to compute the votes justly and report the facts to the district attorney for further action.
This is no problem for the crooked dems. They’ll just manufacture bogus “Unique voter ID’s” to go with their bogus ballots.
The NYT is basically admitting that Democrats can’t win without cheating.
Yep. That’s exactly what they’re admitting. If they can’t cheat, their odds of winning go way way down. There’s a reason why Democrats have been systematically opposed to every single last election integrity measure in every state. Hint: its the same reason bank robbers oppose alarms, safes and armed guards.
1) extremely strict rules in place for absentee voting (and thus a relatively small number of such votes).
2) You show up to vote.
3) you show up on election day (note, I did not say week, month, season...no......DAY)
4) you show government issued photo ID which proves you are who you say you are - ie a citizen lawfully entitled to vote
5) you vote on paper ballots......so as to leave an audit trail.
6) Opposition parties have a meaningful right to observe and challenge each ballot. "Meaningful" means they're sitting right there (or standing) looking right over the shoulder of the person counting each ballot. Yes, close enough that vote counter can smell their BO and bad breath. Close enough that they can easily read each ballot.
7) There is no stoppage of the vote count. EVER. FOR ANY REASON.
8) All challenged ballots go to a committee composed of members of all parties to determine who the ballot is cast for.
9) results announced that evening.
The beauty of this is that dead people, non citizens, underage people, people who claim to reside at a PO Box or on a street corner or in a cemetery, etc find it difficult to go down in person and present valid ID.
The Biden/Harris regime glad-handed illegals pouring over
the border, bringing crime and chaos to American communities.
Battleground America ^ | 7/10/24 | Tara Servatius
FR Posted on 7/11/2024, 8:06:56 AM by Babsig
Source —— Talk radio 989 WORD Greenville SC:
<><>they register illegals to vote at proliferating migrant centers,
<><>they get ballots mailed there (to “harvest” them later)
<><>most illegals dont even know they were registered to vote, and have already moved away.
<><>Dem fraudsters then use the mfg ballots to boost Harris into the WH.
Well, I hope you’re right but I’ve been in Gwinnett for 39 years and I’m not expecting much.
<>In instances where the number of ballots cast surpasses the number of unique voter IDs, the Board is required to determine which voting method the discrepancy originated from and conduct a thorough investigation. Votes from the affected precinct will not be counted until the investigation is completed and the results are presented to the Board, as mandated by GA Code § 21-2-493(b).<>
Yep. Meaning Fulton and deKalb county can’t submit bad data and the state go “well it’s close enough.”
I forgot about that part.and finding the discrepancy is now pretty east. 😉
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.