Posted on 08/20/2024 8:35:39 AM PDT by Red Badger
Every once in a while, The New York Times accidentally publishes a brutally honest report.
Nick Coransaniti admitted on Monday in a piece for The New York Times that the new election laws in Georgia and new election integrity rules will likely cost Democrats the election.
They’re obviously telling us they cheat.
Maybe the new laws in Georgia ought to be the blueprint for saving the election and the United States from the dirty Marxists!?
As reported earlier, the Georgia Election Board has voted 3-2 in favor of a new rule mandating that election workers compare the total number of ballots cast with the total number of unique voter ID numbers in the system.
This rule aims to ensure that every vote cast in the state is legitimate and that any discrepancies are thoroughly investigated before election results can be certified.
The new rule, reported by former RNC official and Trump’s spokeswoman Liz Harrington, is set to overhaul how precincts handle election returns.
Under the rule, if discrepancies are found in any precinct—where the number of ballots exceeds the number of unique voter IDs—the counties are required to withhold certification of the election results until the suspected fraud is fully investigated and resolved.
According to the newly approved regulation, the Georgia Election Board members are tasked with scrutinizing the voting data in each precinct. Specifically, the rule stipulates:
Tabulating Results: After each election, but no later than 3 PM on the Friday following the election, the Election Board must conduct a review of precinct returns. This includes tabulating all absentee ballots, advance voting, Election Day in-person voting, and provisional ballots. The total number of unique voter IDs will then be compared with the total ballots cast in each precinct.
Investigating Discrepancies: In instances where the number of ballots cast surpasses the number of unique voter IDs, the Board is required to determine which voting method the discrepancy originated from and conduct a thorough investigation. Votes from the affected precinct will not be counted until the investigation is completed and the results are presented to the Board, as mandated by GA Code § 21-2-493(b).
Certification of Results: Once all precinct discrepancies have been investigated and corrected, the accurate returns will be recorded and verified. Only then will the consolidated returns be certified by the superintendent, with the certification deadline set at 5:00 PM on the Monday following the election. The certified returns must then be immediately transmitted to the Secretary of State.
The rule also empowers Board members to examine all election-related documentation before certifying the results, ensuring that any potential fraud is detected and addressed before the election results become official. If fraud is discovered, the Board is obligated to compute the votes justly and report the facts to the district attorney for further action.
BTTT
Actually I agree with this. I am an election worker in georgia and I really like the changes.
You can still cheat but it’s easy to catch in an audit. Fast to catch as well.
But what does it do about voting computers switching votes?
Good, because cheating is in democrat DNA. They will cheat because it is what they do.
It’s PA, AZ and Michigan that worry me.
Thats awesome.
Thanks for being there and representing our side...too may times, the left wing scumbags have managed and dominated the voting process in so many key areas...to their benefit.
Looks Like we got a victory in PA today too.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4259612/posts
If you could re-design an election system to be fraud-proof, as much as possible, what main points would you focus on?
There are still many many ways to cheat in an election that this will not catch. This is a good rule, but it only prevents a certain kind of fraud, not all fraud. Here are just a couple of the ways fraud happens.
- fraudulent voter registrations are then voted
- a corrupt precinct simply creates ballots for people who did not vote and signs them in
- computer / tabulator fraud
- intentional tabulation “errors”
There is a good paper+digital audit trail for that.
It starts with retaining paper ballots printed and reviewed by the voter, the county retaining those paper ballots, the county retaining images (from scanner) from every precinct, and retaining one of two disc drives from the scanner. County totals all precinct (all traceable and auditable) and reporting totals.to the secretary of state election office. Numbers must match from paper ballots ( where you can see the votes but not voter) all the way to state totals.
That’s not all the steps.but it’d be really hard to fudge the numbers and not go undetected, and that check can be performed rapidly.
PS the number of ballots and checkins MUST match.the number of voted every hour, and that is done at every precinct and those checks are recorded on paper and called in to the county at least twice a day.
There is a good paper+digital audit trail for that.
It starts with retaining paper ballots printed and reviewed by the voter, the county retaining those paper ballots, the county retaining images (from scanner) from every precinct, and retaining one of two disc drives from the scanner. County totals all precinct (all traceable and auditable) and reporting totals.to the secretary of state election office. Numbers must match from paper ballots ( where you can see the votes but not voter) all the way to state totals.
That’s not all the steps.but it’d be really hard to fudge the numbers and not go undetected, and that check can be performed rapidly.
PS the number of ballots and checkins MUST match.the number of voted every hour, and that is done at every precinct and those checks are recorded on paper and called in to the county at least twice a day.
I would improve absentee voter validation and ballot verification.
PS no more hundreds of ballot.drop off places allowed. You have to bring it.to your county office and you can’t bring more than yours. That’s law now.
t last two are difficult to do, and it is easy to catch in an audit.
Your prior items are doable sadly. Corrupt people end to end is hard to stop.
Trump needs to focus on Arizona and Pennsylvania. GA and NC are in the bag.
Sorry for typos.
On mobile.
If you believe this I have swampland in Florida for sale. 😃
Its no defense against all of the illegals in GA that have been registered to vote and likely had a mail in ballot filled out and put in a drop box for them. 7%-12% of the 400,000 illegals are now registered. At 9% that’s 36,000 votes for Kamala. Then you have the machines simply switching Trump votes to Kamala.
All other states should follow.
Yeah, I know...FAT CHANCE!
2. The machine switching votes safeguard starts with you inspecting your.printed ballot prior to scanning. That is entirely detectable.during an audit. If it happens later in the process (after scanning) it is now easily detected and auditable.
1. Not sure on the voter database integrity. Like you I view that as a weakness. I need data to have an informed opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.