Posted on 07/28/2024 8:29:49 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
In this video we cover new bullet trajectory evidence that no one is looking at.
Includes excerpts from Mike Bell Bullet Trajectory Video: • Trump Shooting | Audio Analysis
all right so new information is coming 0:02
out every single day but I think this 0:04
information this evidence that we're 0:05
going to go over in just a few minutes 0:06
is going to change your mind on a lot of 0:08
different things let's get into 0:23
it hey folks Gary here with Paramount 0:25
and you know I think uh like many of you 0:27
out there July 13th had a pro pretty 0:29
profound 0:30
uh effect on me as it did the rest of 0:32
the nation I think it was clearly an 0:34
attack on our country clearly attack on 0:36
our Democratic electoral system um and 0:39
it had the major impact of just further 0:42
erosion of our trust in government 0:45
institutions and our own you know 0:46
capabilities here in the United States 0:48
you know I think it's pretty hard for us 0:49
to understand or at least to process 0:50
when we have what we believe to be the 0:52
absolute Premiere the best in the world 0:54
when it comes to personal protection you 0:56
know the Secret Service and when we see 0:57
such utter incompetence of what we think 1:00
are the absolute best in the world the 1:01
idea of a conspiracy automatically jumps 1:03
into mind and I think we should we 1:05
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
So did the shooter not have a view of the whole body.
Five shell casings were next to the body.
Three shell casings were not next to the body. I want to see proof of the chain of custody on those three.
“An audio analysis ...”
As I remember there were many problems with his analysis discussed here.
“An audio analysis ... “
Video and audio analysis from the shooting indicates the gunman fired eight shots. Audio experts Rob Maher of Montana State University and Steven Beck of Beck Audio Forensics told CBS News they identified 10 gunshots from the recordings of the event. The first eight rounds had similar acoustic characteristics and originated from the same location.
“Three shell casings were not next to the body. “
Source, please.
You can find the pictures of the casings yourself.
I believe a shot from the water tower would have been obstructed. Has anyone seen anything similar?
I haven’t been convinced anyone was a second shooter with Crooks.
No offense but please don’t denigrate the people like me who are open to the front shooter theory in 1963.
Anyone who watches the 6 hours of the supplementary material in the JFK Revisited dvd set (2022 release) would have doubts about the other theories. People still alive for the 2022 interviews had never been called to testify or were directly threatened to keep quiet.
Three different interview tapes and transcriptions were “lost” by the FBI as was the first medical examiner’s official illustration of the injury to JFK’s skull which matched the skull fragment later recovered from the street.
A new illustration was made up by a replacement medical examiner after the initial autopsy to agree with the later FBI report. The first was “lost” but the examiner described it later after being silenced during the hearings.
People interviewed now are sure there was another shooter and even Oswald’s activities were remembered by eyewitnesses as not adding up to the government’s story. But their tapes had been “lost” in 1964.
Today people know the Secret Service, FBI and DOJ as well as a President’s administration do not have to be trusted like a choir child trusts the minister.
If that is the woman behind Trump that some people are carrying on about I really don’t see why. It takes a while for some people to register what they are witnessing if the event is unexpected. While they do so they continue whatever they were doing as if nothing weird happened until the brain finally sends a clear message to fight or flight.
Chilling theory about the future assassination attempts on a Christian talk show today.
“All they will need is one Secret Service agent either threatened or paid off and that one will shoot next time.”
Wild. Unfounded. But America today?
Our divided populace now has “was the judge pro or anti Trump”, “was the appeals court judge appointed by a GOP or Dem” “was the news report by a pro or anti Trump person” and “were the police under stand down orders from a mayor and chief who were woke?” “The jury pool is from an 89% Dem county.”
Soon: “Were the Secret Service agents pro or anti-Trump?”
Politics now means
life or death.
The young man regularly went to gun ranges... he was not in need of a professional assistant to get past a cobbled together bunch of lazy government employees who had never worked together before and take his shots.
But a gun range is no substitute for practice on live targets. Buck fever is a thing and great range shooters don’t always look so great on their first deer hunt. Shooting at a human target would be much more intense than a case of buck fever.
“You can find the pictures of the casings yourself.”
So, you can’t back up your post.
Then who hit Trump. The measured pro? But Crooks was on the direct line to the eventual landing spot on Trump. There were many people on the ground the building Crooks fired from. It was the highest structure so no gunman behind it. So the sweaty rapid fire amateur gets the hit and tge pro misses three times.
“..refused an ambulance.
“Otherwise, he would have died on the way to the hospital.”
I think you’re right. Probably all kinds of redundancies were built into the scheme.
My first hint: I have seen clearer photos of Bigfoot.
I sure can't!
Lend us a clue to the link, at least.
Yes, the woman behind Trump is the one this theory identifies as Janeen DiGuiseppi. I don’t see enough in the photo to confirm the identification, and in any case this person is obviously not shooting a rifle; and there are other problems with this theory—doesn’t make much sense for a coconspirator to sit in the line of fire, for one thing.
Well, then you go with the "one shooter" paradigm.. and I'll stick with "TWO SHOOTERS".. is that O.K with you Holmes?
“Politics now means
life or death.”
Except only the establishment kills.
True.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.