Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/15/2024 6:49:48 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: george76

that officer needs to be fired


2 posted on 07/15/2024 6:52:24 AM PDT by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The Democrats want PDJT dead. Nothing could be more obvious. Also the entire federal bureaucracy wants him dead. They almost got him Saturday. They won’t give up either.


5 posted on 07/15/2024 6:55:01 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

As far as conspiracies go, what I can’t understand is why secret service or law enforcement weren’t covering that rooftop the whole time. It seems like more than just a lapse or error.

But to play devil’s advocate on a few things, I think I can understand why they didn’t shot him. I have a feeling they just weren’t sure. No one wanted to take a shot during a political rally and be blamed for killing a civilian. Can you imagine being perched with a sniper rifle and having to make the call to shoot across a crowd to kill someone who hasn’t started shooting yet? Or worse, killing a member of law enforcement who was collaborating on security?

I’d be willing to bet that if they release the audio from the secret service or if it comes out in an investigation that you would hear a lot of chatter like “Is he ours? Is that our asset? I NEED CONFIRMATION that he has a gun and is not law enforcement”

I think a lot of people just aren’t thinking through what it would have been like to be there.


6 posted on 07/15/2024 6:56:08 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Nothing stopped the cop from shooting rounds in the air to alert trump. They’re just making stuff up as they go along.


8 posted on 07/15/2024 6:59:57 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Multiple conflicting pieces to the story. Witnesses saw the perp crawling up to a roof, then "bear crawling" and traversing buildings to the final building roof.

The mysterious ladder--reports do not describe the cop climbing a ladder. Media reports he climbed down a ladder. Another report describes the cop was hoisted up to peer over the roofline, dropped/falling to the ground after encountering the perp aiming his weapon at the cop.

16 posted on 07/15/2024 7:11:28 AM PDT by NautiNurse (The Biden Organized Crime Family is holding out for a big payout to the BIG GUY. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The officer had no choice. Only in the movies can one fire a gun while hanging onto a ladder. It takes two hands to fire a gun.
Even if you could fire a gun with one hand, the recoil would likely throw you backwards off the ladder. Also you are an easy target for someone on the area above you.

The only choice was to retreat and call for help. The assassin was forced into firing right away and possibly that added to the the factors of him not getting off a deadly shot.

Trying to blame this officer is just a diversion by the media .


18 posted on 07/15/2024 7:14:21 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

They have/had ONE job. Has this Cheetos Director been dismissed, yet?


19 posted on 07/15/2024 7:15:28 AM PDT by Jane Long (The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded letters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

” The officer retreated down the ladder, and Crooks quickly took a shot toward Trump, and that’s when Secret Service snipers shot him”

“the AP is now reporting that a police officer saw the gunman before the shots were fired, and the police officer retreated allowing time for the shooter to fire 5 shots toward his target “


Both statements above can’t be true.


20 posted on 07/15/2024 7:19:06 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

In other words it was a govt hit job gone wrong.


30 posted on 07/15/2024 7:38:41 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

When he got to the top of the ladder, the kid pointed the rifle at him, whereupon the cop started back down. Radios presumably started crackling about this rifle-armed kid. Cops aren’t paid to commit suicide. When your adversary has the drop on you, procedure is to back away and maneuver for a better position.

Susan Crabtree on Secret Service policy. Some of this could be based on candidate fear of political blowback, if an innocent gets killed.


[Here’s my reporting on why the Secret Service did not shoot until AFTER the shooter engaged and some context about the House Republicans’ investigation already underway (months before Trump’s assassination attempt) into whether the agency’s DEI policies are affecting its readiness.
The blowback against the Secret Service started within the hour of the assassination attempt and continued even after Trump and other credited the agency with saving Trump’s life by quickly killing a shooter crawling across a nearby rooftop.

But a source within the Secret Service community tells RealClearPolitics that the agency rules of engagement in this situation are to wait until the president is fired upon to return fire.

“You want to take a shot then find out the guy was holding a telescope?” the source suggested. “The Secret Service is by nature reactive…and you better be right when you do react or you’re f-——d.”

The Secret Service protocol requires that a counter sniper aware of a potential shooter to radio directly to intelligence division team to respond and investigate. In this case, the investigation may have been cut short by the shooter firing his weapon, so the counter sniper then fired as quickly as possible in return.

The source praised the counter sniper who acquired the target and responded within three seconds, calling their performance “incredible.”

“The counter snipers are highly trained and extremely accurate,” he said.]


From the cop’s standpoint, it makes sense. Thanks to Floyd, we’ve seen a violent felon’s death from drug overdose send four cops to prison for multiple decades each, while sending their families into bankruptcy. Putting a civilian down who turned out not to be an assassin could have catastrophic personal consequences. Qualified immunity is not a theoretical issue to a police sniper, given the generally lethal or catastrophically injurious nature of what they are tasked with doing.


33 posted on 07/15/2024 7:46:21 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

A commenter who spent time in war zones makes a few points:


[This is going to be a very, very unpopular take of mine - here goes

We’ve all seen this photo by now of the sniper taking his view off of the scope. Hesitating.

Honestly? I probably would have done the same in that situation. I will explain.

Think about it. You’re not in Syria. You’re on sniper duty at a political rally in the US. You usually don’t have threats. Whatever “threats” you do have are usually an unruly Bernie Bro that venue security can just throw out and Secret Service doesn’t even need to get involved

Then you see something. Looks like a gun. Better get this right! We all remember what happened to Derek Chauvin. (Sticks head up, looks to confirm) Imagine shooting an unarmed civilian because you *thought* you saw a gun. Seriously, imagine the news stories the next day.

You’ve heard of fight or flight, but there is a third option: freeze. You’re not in Syria or Iraq. It’s not that kind of rules of engagement. What do you do? Better get this right

Then the shots confirm what you saw, and you return fire. All this thought process happens in about 3 seconds if you watch the clip. It’s easy to pick about that clip now but at the time...nobody was even watching. They were listening to the Trump speech. That was it.

Again, you’re probably not going to like my take. I don’t really like it either. It’s the kind of thing that training is supposed to fix. But I also understand.

You get this one wrong, you’re doing a life sentence.

Before someone says “but qualified immunity”, look, he gets this shot wrong, the first news headline is “TRUMP BODYGUARDS MURDERING INNOCENT MINORITY WOMEN AND CHILDREN” and connect the dots on how the DOJ will respond.]


36 posted on 07/15/2024 7:52:38 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
They groomed, chemicalized then triggered some 20 year old to commit suicide for their greater purpose(start a civil war?).

...we are dealing with evil.

We need to stop trying to rationalize/ignore this cancer, and start removing it.

...before it does the same to us.

38 posted on 07/15/2024 7:57:11 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Time to throw them out of the Temple...again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Well, in defense of the SS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U9Yl5CXvcQ


39 posted on 07/15/2024 7:59:06 AM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Something is very wrong with the whole picture. How could the shooter park his car, walk across a parking lot with a long gun hanging from is shoulder dressed in shorts and t-shirt, walk up to a ladder, climb the ladder and crawl up the roof, all the while observers are yelling at police, for a perfect shot at a target 130 yards away, and no one pays any attention even though people are yelling at the police. The shooter has a better shooters position than the SS behind Trump. Then fires 4 shots before the SS CAT team takes him out. Logic is lacking.


44 posted on 07/15/2024 8:05:46 AM PDT by chopperk (are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

I watched a video where people were screaming they saw the shooter climbing up to the roof several minutes before he fired a single shot. During that time the SS should have ushered Trump off the stage. TOTAL INCOMPETENCE!


45 posted on 07/15/2024 8:07:16 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Those who give up some freedom for some liberty deserve neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


49 posted on 07/15/2024 8:20:52 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The mistakes were made long before this officer encountered Crooks on the roof. In fact, at this point it was too late. There really should have been police and or secret service coverage on the roof to begin with. That is the thing to investigate.


53 posted on 07/15/2024 8:25:19 AM PDT by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Probably ROE...can’t shoot unless authorized over his radio. Almost like someone higher up wanted it to happen.


55 posted on 07/15/2024 8:26:29 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Former active duty serviceman on the friction between decisionmaker and trigger puller in protection gigs. In a war zone, you can’t just shoot anyone you see, but there are few witnesses and you can shoehorn narratives to paper over screw-ups. At political rallies, there are many sets of eyes, including electronic ones, to put you in prison if you mistakenly take out a civilian.


[Some thoughts on why you should ask a few more questions before jumping to a conclusion about why someone did or didn’t pull a trigger. I spent a few years at SEAL Team Six, so take your air soft tactics and sit this one out.

If you’re asking why the counter-sniper didn’t take the shot. You should be asking, was he allowed to make that decision on his own or did he need approval.

Protection is an interagency game of politics where the trigger puller is rarely the decision maker. Lots of unknowns go into making a decision that seems simple in hindsight. Everything is easier when you have time to judge all the variables.

Before you jump to judging the person making the call, realize they can’t see what the sniper sees and is being relayed information over a radio from someone they probably met that morning in a briefing room. There is little trust between them. The decision maker has to trust that the sniper knows what he’s looking at and isn’t mistaking it for another team on the wrong roof. If this sounds silly, I encourage to you get on a walkie talkie and try to give another human directions live.

Additionally, the real world for the Secret Service has been one of peace since Reagan. While there has undoubtedly always been risks, they have not materialized and therefore are not real to the man or woman in the field. It is very easy to be lulled into a sense of calm when nothing goes “wrong” for such a long time. You train and plan for a what if. Unfortunately, training for a what if will never replicate real world.

Real world experience is training. Unfortunately, If that training is only in peace time. If you never really get shot at, if nothing goes wrong, you end up unconsciously training peace time habits. Peace time habits end up being bad habits once you enter a real world scenario (I hesitate to say war time since this is not war).

You should ask how much training these men and woman receive and is it adequate. Unfortunately, training cost money and budgets have been reduced. It’s gets hard to justify additional training when nothing bad happens (I imagine this will now change). If you don’t know what training they get, I suggest you ask or research. It’s not what you think and often far less than it should be.

Lastly, in a world where police have been prosecuted for making incorrect decisions or taking action that results in a suspect being killed, do you think that thought doesn’t weigh on their every decision? If you think it shouldn’t impact them, I encourage you to think harder. Nobody wants to go to jail for doing their job. Right, wrong or indifferent. Police included.

To close, if you are pointing blame at someone else for what they did or didn’t do, you should look around and realize this is the world you allowed to develop. We allowed police to be defunded. We allowed politics to become so divided. Yesterday was just the result of a long list of small decisions that culminated in a near miss. What looks like a cause on the surface is rarely the root cause. If you aren’t asking questions, you will never get to the root cause and in turn solutions that can fix this.]


60 posted on 07/15/2024 8:35:40 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Saw a rally video this morning where it was clear that security cleared a field of fire for the assassin just seconds before shots were fired.

Couple that with the Secret Service snipers holding fire until after they knew that Trump was down and the administrations deniability gets mighty thin.


64 posted on 07/15/2024 9:03:18 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again," )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson