Posted on 07/15/2024 6:01:26 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/secret-service-faces-serious-questions-about-security-footprint-and-rooftop-access-at-trump-event/index.html
https://x.com/ywnreporter/status/1812648353169060042?s=46&t=oXM3QUNDayEotvdo1W-zQA
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1812665335075483945?s=46&t=oXM3QUNDayEotvdo1W-zQA
https://fortune.com/2024/07/14/donald-trump-assassination-attempt-shooter-thomas-matthew-crooks-bomb-making-materials-vehicle-home/
https://www.businessinsider.com/ex-secret-service-agents-how-trump-assassin-could-fire-shots-2024-7
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/secret-service-faces-serious-questions-about-security-footprint-and-rooftop-access-at-trump-event/index.html
https://thelibertydaily.com/7-things-we-know-about-would-be-assassin/
I put these links in so people could access the story. The US Federal Government has made two claims that I feel are implausible. The first claim is that the shooter was 'acting' alone. That means, in less than 12 hours they have claimed to research every part of his life, his contacts, his past, where he has been, who he as been with, who he may have been speaking with on-line (including on xbox/game consoles), where he trained and were he got him ammunition. I find that implausible.
The second is even more serious. This is the statement, from multiple individuals with video, that the sniper was recognized minutes before. The first claim is that they didn't know falls out because of the video evidence. The second claim that they couldn't shoot until the sniper shot first is ludicrous. The third claim that they needed authority to shoot with someone with a rifle aimed at a POTUS is so stupid not to bother in conversation. The final 'it was local cop problem' makes zero sense because they outlined the building as a risk during walkthrough.
When you start to see the Government and the Media try to make things up as they go along, it's a cover-up. Plain and simple, something is wrong.
“We’re entering dangerous times, as Biden needs to be replaced and this narrative of trump victorious needs to be flipped. Prepare yourself.”
I believe we are entering dangerous times, and it’s more likely to get uglier.
“It looks like he might have had a CIA handler.”
I went to the American Thinker article you linked and read the article about “skvmlord.” After reading the article I thought “skvmlord” was just another of many kooks on the Internet.
Then I came back to your comment about a CIA handler (which I had forgotten while reading the AT article). That’s certainly an interesting conjecture, Tom.
It was the Deep State—Obama and the Biden crime family are their pawns and public pinatas.
The folks who planned the attempted assassination keep a very low profile—for obvious reasons.
Americans.
None of those things you listed are American.
“Don’t assign a conspiracy where idiotic and lazy government workers are involved. It is likely they just screwed up.”
I get this truth, but the thing is they are clearly making statements that cannot be true at this point. I am not saying that I know what happened, or who exactly is involved. I am only saying that the statements made are not likely and don’t make sense. That means it’s a coverup, maybe a coverup of a screw up, but it’s still a coverup.
The fact they tried to assassinate POTUS Trump 2 days before the Republican National Convention is all of the proof you need.
That was not a coincidence!!
DNA isn’t collected from that many people.
That is a most excellent post, RN. It would be worthy of publication at American Thinker.
That DNA claim was also not true because fingerprints are a more likely and useful biometric than DNA.
Mark
I haven’t taken off my tinfoil hat yet and I too have many question about how a 20 year old loser type could access what should have been a cleared area and apparently without any serious firearm training get off five shots one of which narrow missed killing Trump. What motivated the kids father to buy him the rifle, certainly not of a type that would be for a novice shooter? Did someone train the shooter and help him select the ideal vantage point? Why did the Secret Service advance team not identify and secure what would have be an obvious sniper position? We can pretty well assume an FBI “investigation” will assuredly conclude the kid was a lone wolf with no particular motivation to kill Trump …case closed.
“where did this ladder come from?”
No kidding. Companies don’t leave ladders lying around for easy access to the roofs of their buildings. A person carrying a ladder would have been highly conspicuous. Did somebody bring the ladder in during the night?
That could certainly be the case. I wonder if we’ll ever really find out.
Just found this...
“Thomas Crooks had not been carrying ID, so investigators used DNA and facial recognition technology to identify him, the FBI said.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3gw58wv4e9o
I would be surprised if their were no cover up.
Wow. I didn’t know this tech existed. That’s amazing. Thanks for enlightening me.
No ID on his person, but they knew his age before his name. Did they count the rings on his skull?
Looking at their website, I realized that the possibilities of this being used in multiple industries are many. Not only human DNA testing, but animal breeders and engineering plant hybrids as well.
“DNA isn’t collected from that many people.”
Tens of millions (hundreds of millions?) of people voluntarily put their DNA into databases. And the DNA of a relative works fine, so the reach of that database grows by 10X? 100X?
So you can probably find few people these days that a DNA test cannot identify through direct DNA match or a match to a relative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.