“Don’t assign a conspiracy where idiotic and lazy government workers are involved. It is likely they just screwed up.”
I get this truth, but the thing is they are clearly making statements that cannot be true at this point. I am not saying that I know what happened, or who exactly is involved. I am only saying that the statements made are not likely and don’t make sense. That means it’s a coverup, maybe a coverup of a screw up, but it’s still a coverup.
It doesn’t make it a coverup, it makes it a normal, confusing, situation where there are literally thousands of sources.
There are lots of pieces of information that need to be collated and teased out to get the truth.
For example: We heard of the policeman going up the ladder to challenge the shooter. Then we hear that the person who went up that ladder was in civilian clothes and was unarmed.
Those are two very different takes on the same situation. But until we hear from that person, the stories will be confusing.
We heard of the people pointing towards the shooter crawling on the roof. But aside from jumping up and down and screaming, was there any direct contact with LEOs which was passed along to the Secret Service or State Police?
The story is good, but and the guy made good video…but suggesting that the Secret Service should have known because some people outside a big rally party we jumping around and waving loudly? There were a lot of folks out there being loud from what I could see. Consider them tailgating at a big football game.
I do not disagree that the initial problem of the building not being secured was the KEY failure. But there are a lot of assumptions about what people were doing or should have been doing that have to be sifted through and put into a timeline.