Posted on 06/28/2024 10:57:01 AM PDT by Red Badger
Yep the Constitution and Supreme Court rulings are such a burden to poor old Jack's anti-Trump crusade. But have faith, he's looking for a "work around" to all that pesky constitutional nonsense.
Checks and Balances.
Three co-equal branches of government: judicial, legislative, and executive.
But the Democrat Party beats ‘em all. Those guys have all the power.
Heard on the radio that this will only completely exonerate about 55 people as it was the only charge against them. The others charged with obstruction also had other charges as part of multiple charges against them.
Wheres the HA HA kid ???
Smith says, “Show me Trump and I will show you the crime!”
Jack Smith is part of an insurrectionist conspiracy to overthrow the republic. TREASON. Never held to account for the damage they have done to the innocent people.
All the dems really care about are checks and balances, but a different kind of check, and a different kind of balance.
The DimWITS are now trying to get President Trump to say he will NOT retaliate against the traitors.
NOBODY wants or needs retaliation. Just charge the DimWITS with what they are guilty. Start w/ Hillary's email server, Obama's and Biden's PAY TO PLAY schemes and the DOJ crimes on Jan 6.
Just start there, the gallows will be busy after the other charges are brought to the Tribunals in GITMO. Some of the presstitutes need to go down there too.
NOTHING will start until after Jan 20, 2025.
Why did it take them so long? The statute is clear on its face.
Lawfare works both ways. Use or lose
We need to up our prayers about God’s justice coming sooner to the corrupt lawyers, judges and congressional outlaws.
Simple answer I would love to hear from Trump: "No, I will not retaliate against anyone. I am for law and order. I will uphold the law. The only people who should have any concern are those who have broken the law."
Smith will claim phony electors to overturn the election. Remember they are diabolical.
An analysis I read remands this back to the lower courts where they can reassess.
The war on the Constitution just grew democrat party won’t stand for it.
They spent to many years and planning to remove or rewrite it.
Fabian Society or nothing is the goal.
Much like the three NYC cases, the DC J6 case is based on a twisted theory of law. Jack off Smith should be disbarred for prosecutorial misconduct along with all the DC judges who deprived J6 protesters of their liberty.
“Lawfare works both ways. Use or lose”
The Supreme Court’s decision was NOT lawfare.
It was quite a straightforward application of the Constitution.
The decision that was reversed, the Chevron decision, was clearly unconstitutional.
When asked about retribution, a smiling President Trump should state “I have no comment about matters still under litigation “.
seems like garland’s response is...he sounds like he’s going to ignore SCOTUS ?
so, what’s to happen to those so affected by ruling ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.