Posted on 05/07/2024 9:49:31 AM PDT by bitt
Stormy Daniels is testifying today in President Trump’s criminal case before crooked Judge Juan Merchan’s courtroom in New York City.
“Judge Merchan agrees with Bragg and Biden’s attorneys saying that Stormy Daniels has “credibility” to testify about an alleged affair, even though she’s repeatedly denied any such affair over the years and even went on record by issuing an official statement denying such an affair.”
BREAKING: Judge Merchan agrees with Bragg and Biden’s attorneys saying that Stormy Daniels has “credibility” to testify about an alleged affair, even though she’s repeatedly denied any such affair over the years and even went on record by issuing an official statement denying… pic.twitter.com/yPd1k1JBXK
— Paul Ingrassia (@PaulIngrassia) May 7, 2024
Stormy Daniels wrote in 2018, “Over the past few weeks I have been asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship I had with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago. The fact of the matter is that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence in 2006, 20011, 2016, 2017 and now again in 2018. 1 am not denying this affair because i was paid “hush money” as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened.”
The Gateway Pundit contributor Paul Ingrassia is inside the courtroom today.
Here are the live updates:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Apparently the judge is interested in hearing non relevant commentary because it excites him.
With skyrocketing debt. Skyrocketing crime. Skyrocketing inflation. Skyrocketing war. The thing this country really needs is to focus on the testimony of an extortionist in a show trial against the regime’s political rival.
Sexual positions relevant to an alleged bookkeeping entry error?
Total circus act.
The judge is a clown, so it's fitting.
A legitimate definition of “Congress” is “sexual intercourse”.
Are teachers allowed to say that in school anymore I had one who did back in the 1970’s.
She was asked if he used a condom, she said NO. I find that hard to believe since Trump is a germophobe.
Regardless, shouldn't the jury hear more about this, it really does shed light on, well, on nothing relevant other than the judge must be a pervert.
Ask Bill Clinton the Democrats have that covered also ask Obama and Diddy.
Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger is a man. Probably fingered Stormy.
the entire point of daniels is to embarrass President Trump and try to cause issues between him and his wife.
the entire point of daniels is to embarrass President Trump and try to cause issues between him and his wife.
Hey, it is NYC, sleaze is standard, not optional.
What we’ll know is the alleged sexual positions. What we STILL don’t know is what crimes they are alleging. I mean what is this, week 5?
Don’t you typically know what you’re being charged with before any trial even starts?
The ‘judge’ is just another aging perv, looking for new late night reading material.
BTW...what do these details have to do with the charges against DJT?
A porn star doesn’t use a condem? Sure.
And maybe a nice pole dance or two for the judge?
One has to wonder if Jeffrey Toobin is watching the trial?
To a billionaire, $100K is like $5 to you and I. It's better to just pay off the extortion fee than to have your name dragged thru the mud over a lie.
Pro-tip: don’t have adulterous affairs. Also record your whereabouts at all times.
Second pro-tip: If you follow Pro-Tip #1, and someone acuses you of an adulterous affair, be a democrat. It’s just a badge of honor for them and expected.
Third pro-tip: make sure your NDA will destroy someone who falsely acuses you. If you did it, you suck and deserve the natural consequences. If you didn’t do it, you don’t suck for that particular reason (but may suck for other reasons), but you still need to show other false accusers that there are consequences for trying to destroy a marriage.
Do you know why Canadians prefer the doggie-style position?
Because they both can keep watching the hockey game.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.