Posted on 02/24/2024 5:59:01 AM PST by SpeedyInTexas
This list only includes destroyed vehicles and equipment of which photo or videographic evidence is available. Therefore, the amount of equipment destroyed is significantly higher than recorded here. Loitering munitions, drones used as unmanned bait, civilian vehicles and derelict equipment are not included in this list. All possible effort has gone into avoiding duplicate entries and discerning the status of equipment between captured or abandoned. Many of the entries listed as 'abandoned' will likely end up captured or destroyed. Similarly, some of the captured equipment might be destroyed if it can't be recovered. When a vehicle is captured and then lost in service with its new owners, it is only added as a loss of the original operator to avoid double listings. When the origin of a piece of equipment can't be established, it's not included in the list. The Soviet flag is used when the equipment in question was produced prior to 1991. This list is constantly updated as additional footage becomes available.
(Excerpt) Read more at oryxspioenkop.com ...
Lenin may be removed from the Mausoleum next year
A source in the Kremlin told us about this. According to him, Vladimir Putin ordered to speed up the development of a “balanced and correct decision” on this issue. The president has been repeatedly offered to remove Lenin's body from the Mausoleum. For example, this was done by philosopher Alexandr Dugin, who believes that a future resting place for Vladimir Vladimirovich should be prepared in the Mausoleum. And now just make a place of worship for the greatness of Russia there.
The philosopher's idea was taken into work. But the president decided to speed up the processes regarding Lenin after he received a posthumous letter from the recently deceased elder Elijah (we wrote about this https://t.me/kremlin_secrets/5439). It called for the leader's body to be removed from the Mausoleum as soon as possible and buried in a secret place. “Vladimir Vladimirovich decided that since God himself, through the mouth of his elder, calls for something to be done, then we need to listen,” the channel's interlocutor explained.
“We are now developing a justification that is understandable to all of Russian society as to why Lenin's body should be removed from the Mausoleum. And plans for what to do with him next. There are several options, I will not reveal them yet. The work is underway. At the moment, we have come to the conclusion that for a number of reasons, organizational and political, it is best to remove Lenin in 2026. Somewhere after the New Year,” the source added.
Several other interlocutors in the Kremlin confirmed to us that work is underway, discussions are underway on several issues. The main one is where to put Lenin's body after it is removed from the Mausoleum.
https://t.me/kremlin_secrets/5507
Kim Fatty III is waiting for the transfer.
Jerome Powell was first nominated as Fed chairman by Pres. Trump in 2017.
He was reappointed by Biden in 2021.
Powell's term as chairman expires May 15, 2026.
Who do you think will replace him?
The Federal Reserve is not funded by taxpayers, just the opposite.
It lives off interest earned from US treasuries & other government securities, i.e., MBS's.
Any profits after expenses the Fed returns to the US treasury.
In a good year, like 2019, the Fed can return over $50 billion to the US treasury.
Will be interesting to see what kind of support such an attack will have. If they have been stockpiling equipment for this what will it consist of Turtle tanks, quads, atvs, electric scooters, motorcycles, and civilian vehicles ?
May have more of a battle of the bulge result. Ukrainians have developed pretty good tactics to deal with such assaults.
Recent Russian announcements of “mobilization” numbers appear more in line with replacement numbers rather than actually growing the over all force structure.
Was referring more to investigating the personal activities and finances of the fed members.
I think their internet activity both public and private would be illuminating, as well as their personal financial activities.
These folks think they are the smartest folks in the room, and that leads to arrogance and sloppiness. Imagine there is a paper trail a mile long that the public would love to see.
Your question is still irrelevant, regardless of who you ask, or how often.
Here are more relevant questions:
Thanks FtrPilot:
For the USA, things are different
The United States has a long history of military interventions and invasions, depending on how one defines "invasion." Below is a list of some notable instances where the U.S. has deployed military forces to engage in combat, overthrow governments, or occupy foreign territory. This is not an exhaustive list, but it covers significant examples:
Mexico (1846–1848) - The Mexican-American War resulted in the U.S. annexing large parts of Mexico's territory, including present-day California, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming.
Cuba (1898) - During the Spanish-American War, the U.S. invaded and occupied Cuba, leading to its temporary control before granting it independence under significant U.S. influence in 1902.
Philippines (1898–1902) - Also part of the Spanish-American War, the U.S. invaded and fought the Philippine-American War to establish control, resulting in the Philippines becoming a U.S. territory until 1946.
Haiti (1915–1934) - The U.S. invaded and occupied Haiti to stabilize the country and protect American interests, maintaining a military presence for nearly two decades. Dominican Republic (1916–1924) - The U.S. invaded and occupied the Dominican Republic to enforce financial and political control, withdrawing after establishing a pro-U.S. government.
Grenada (1983) - Operation Urgent Fury saw U.S. forces invade Grenada to overthrow a Marxist government and protect American citizens, leading to a brief occupation.
Panama (1989) - Operation Just Cause involved a U.S. invasion to depose dictator Manuel Noriega, resulting in significant casualties and a temporary occupation. Iraq (1991) - The Gulf War saw the U.S. lead a coalition to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait, though it did not occupy Iraq at that time. A full invasion came later in 2003. Afghanistan (2001) - Following the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan to dismantle al-Qaeda and remove the Taliban from power, leading to a prolonged occupation until 2021.
Iraq (2003) - The U.S. invaded Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein’s regime, initiating a long-term occupation and conflict that lasted until 2011, with subsequent interventions against ISIS.
Other cases could be debated depending on the definition of "invasion." For example: Vietnam (1965–1973) - While not a traditional invasion to conquer territory, the U.S. deployed massive ground forces to support South Vietnam against North Vietnam and the Viet Cong.
Libya (2011) - The U.S. led NATO airstrikes to support rebels against Muammar Gaddafi, but did not deploy ground troops for occupation.
Please try harder.
Stock & bond markets taking another nose dive in response to the Peter Navarro inspired “tariff” regime.
WarTranslated@wartranslated
Meanwhile, Russia’s military circles are start grasping the true cost of Putin’s “party” in terms of killed and missing, noting there’s still no unified registry in Russia - otherwise, the inconvenient numbers would be glaringly obvious to the military leadership.
Video with English text:
Still attacking Trump and his administration?
Speaking of markets taking a dive, world oil continues it’s plunge. Recent prices: Brent Crude ($64), West Texas Intermediate (WTI-$62), and Russia’s Ural price ($52). Very bad for Putin’s economy, and if Trump adds punishing tariffs for countries which dare to buy Russian oil, total disaster. More detail below from mm:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4309398/posts
The Kremlin is sweating right now.
Russia economy meltdown as oil prices crash 31% in fresh blow for Putin
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4309392/posts
Zimbabwe the latest to withdraw tariffs on US goods.
Argentina and US at near zero tariff agreement.EU offers "zero for zero" industrial tariff deal.
WINNING— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchwe94560) April 7, 2025
Globalists are melting down across cable TV
Is this what you voted for?
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) April 7, 2025
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.