Posted on 01/19/2024 5:06:53 PM PST by Rummyfan
In retrospect, perhaps Fani Willis should have kept her mouth shut. Yesterday, the embattled Fulton County DA filed a motion in the Wade v Wade divorce action asking to quash a subpoena for her testimony. Rather than just argue that her testimony would be irrelevant in a case where both spouses agree that the marriage was “irretrievably broken” — certainly an arguable position — Willis accused Jocelyn Wade of “obstruction” of her prosecution of Donald Trump et al. And then Willis went one step further in accusing Mrs. Wade of infidelity as the cause of the divorce.
Big mistake. Big, big mistake. And when I say “big,” I mean monumental:
.....
Mrs. Wade’s attorneys actually produced the records, eliminating all doubt that the special prosecutor Willis hired had provided her financial benefit from the relationship...
CNN also picked up on the story this afternoon. As the AJC did, CNN includes the rebuttal to Willis’ claim that Mrs. Wade intends to ‘obstruct’ her RICO prosecution. That’s nonsense, Mrs. Wade’s attorneys state in the filing; what they want is a clear picture of Nathan Wade’s finances, and what he’s done with them rather than support his spouse....
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Gee, Georgia’s RICO law emphasizes that it should be used to prosecute financial crimes or those involving injury to another….. I think Fani’s the one who violated RICO Laws……
Hell hath no fury...
.
Yes, and FANI invited that motion with receipts.
I doubt she knows how to play checkers
Uncredible. Just genetic trash. The whole lot of them. Like some sort of carrion eater, they can’t help themselves.
Arrogant smug B.
Soros Paid? Probably
Woman Scorned better be careful she’s dealing with democrats bodies get cold fast with the crowd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.