Here a video from a PhD who actually analyzed a bunch of the vials (some expired, some not) and found:
1) the contents of the vials, when analyzed by some standard industry method or other, had SV40 promoter genes; the software used by the tools automatically annotates the results with labels from known sequences.
2) Pfizer's documentation of what they said was in the vials (which, you know, was supposed to have been the same stuff) did NOT have the SV40: which means that that someone had to go in and modify the annotations to take out the SV40 identifier from the output, before giving the printouts of the analysis to the government.
3) The SV40 drags stuff directly INTO THE NUCLEUS. Which all the "Because SCIENCE™!" people had assured us was impossible.
4) And when they did PCR on the contents of the vials, it took 17 cycles to pick up the DNA contaminants: whereas, during the scamdemic, when people had PCR run on their blood to look for COVID, sometimes up to 40 cycles were run. Which means there was in these vials up to 1 million times more DNA, then the amount of COVID-associated RNA fragments sufficient to "diagnose" them with COVID.
In the video starting at 3:17 and after that.
Any slight errors are due to my poor hearing combined with my wife telling me to turn the volumn down over and over... 🙁
https://rumble.com/v3z58rg-kevin-mckernan-presentation-to-the-croatian-parliament.html
Thanks.
So sad that a presentation like this takes place in the Croatian parliament and not before the House or Senate in the supposed Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, or at least in a statehouse somewhere.
You might want to take a look at this.
https://market-ticker.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=250254
Seems like the psuedo-uridine is not quite as safe as its being touted. This just came out. Ooops.
It induces +1 frame shifting errors in mRna encoding causing inflamation(myocarditis anyone?).
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3