To: E. Pluribus Unum
King Putz is a climate nazi. One of original true believers. He would send the great unwashed back to the Middle Ages if he could
2 posted on
05/06/2023 11:50:44 AM PDT by
gibsonguy
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hanovers, not Windsors. Let’s not be trans about it. You can’t pretend to be a different sex, or pretend not to be German.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, that didn’t take long.
4 posted on
05/06/2023 11:52:00 AM PDT by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It always amazes me the devotion some Freepers have to the “British” royals. We should agree to repatriate these loyalists back to their homeland.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The King is IN CHARGE OF NOTHING!
6 posted on
05/06/2023 11:53:04 AM PDT by
G Larry
( DEI = Division + Erroneous Indoctrination)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
13 posted on
05/06/2023 12:06:35 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s been going on for a while......saw part of a documentary the other day about the short reign of Edward VIII in the 1930s.......seems he had a fondness for married women......sound familiar?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_VIII#
14 posted on
05/06/2023 12:11:14 PM PDT by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Genocide, false flags and pedophilia?
Well he is a member of the ruling class.
19 posted on
05/06/2023 12:49:10 PM PDT by
Salman
(It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I watched that video. It was just snarky nonsense.
King George III, born in England, ruled during the American Revolution was of German parentage.
Princess Diana was from the House of Tudor, a native British line and some think she was more blue-blooded than anyone in the Windsor line. Queen Elizabeth basically arranged her marriage to Charles.
Wonder if William will tinker with the family name when he becomes king. It evidently is not a problem to change the name.
20 posted on
05/06/2023 1:01:08 PM PDT by
odawg
To: E. Pluribus Unum
21 posted on
05/06/2023 1:23:01 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
its official
king charles the turd
the first ran into a spot of trouble
24 posted on
05/06/2023 2:01:05 PM PDT by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Meet King Charles, the Great Resetter = In Reverse
He lacks the wisdom of his mother and spine England to see hard times with him.
He’s to far left
29 posted on
05/06/2023 3:41:06 PM PDT by
Vaduz
(....)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
When Elizabeth II and Prince Philip passed away all vestiges of decency and class went with them. There really isn't anything to look up to with this new bunch. It's hard to garner much respect for a guy who was recorded blathering to his mistress about wanting to be a tampon so he could live in her hoo-hah, the hoo-hah attached to the mistress who is now the queen. The royals now are just well dressed trailer park trash. The whole royals thing just lost a lot of it's luster and became less interesting. Without that they lose their tourist attraction value which is really the only reason they exist any more.
I don't have a dog in the fight but it looks like it would be a lot easier for the Brits to bounce Charles than it would have been Elizabeth. There's much less to recommend keeping these figureheads around now than there was a couple of years ago.
33 posted on
05/06/2023 5:07:37 PM PDT by
GaryCrow
To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
34 posted on
05/06/2023 5:18:06 PM PDT by
Orlando
To: E. Pluribus Unum
35 posted on
05/06/2023 7:30:39 PM PDT by
Jane Long
(What we were told was a conspiracy theory in ‘20 is now fact. Land of the sheep, home of the knaves)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What we all need to know about King Charles:
36 posted on
05/06/2023 8:43:44 PM PDT by
GingisK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson