Posted on 12/06/2022 9:05:18 AM PST by RobaWho
Why is the “secret” Brunson v Adams lawsuit officially scheduled for a US Supreme Court Hearing being met with defeating silence from America’s so-called media elite?
This Civil Lawsuit was proactively hand-selected by the US Supreme Court in October of 2022, was written and filed by a band of brothers (an actual band of trumpet playing brothers) without attorney representation, and seeks the most historic and consequential judicial remedy in American history. Why no coverage?
This video explores the WHY Questions that aren’t being asked - but should be. The links below provide factual “receipts” available for all to see - including America’s biased media.
Imbedded video & extensive linking available at link.
(Excerpt) Read more at robcunningham.substack.com ...
The single most powerful warfare weapon is Deception - General Sun Tzu. Our world is at war and brilliant Generals 1) ALWAYS use deception and 2) NEVER announce their exact tactics, plans or strategy. What part of the Supreme Court having unlimited, unrestricted flexibility to when/where/how they meet, adjudicate and publicly announce their actions/decisions? So, WHENEVER the hell they, or those who “advise” or reign control over them, can direct their timing as “battlefield conditions” dictate.
WOW - dude! You should be in Vegas all the time. You have ALL the answers and know everything, you MUST be super wealthy! Which governments and Fortune 100 companies do you consult for? Just curious.
The single most powerful warfare weapon is Deception - General Sun Tzu. Our world is at war and brilliant Generals 1) ALWAYS use deception and 2) NEVER announce their exact tactics, plans or strategy. What part of the Supreme Court having unlimited, unrestricted flexibility to when/where/how they meet, adjudicate and publicly announce their actions/decisions? So, WHENEVER the hell they, or those who “advise” or reign control over them, can direct their timing as “battlefield conditions” dictate.
So the court sifted among 8,000+ cases to select this specific case, at this specific time, a lawyer-less citizen lawsuit with overwhelming power, clarity and import, only to rub the public’s face in it, then dismiss it? Does this pretty much summarize your opinion?
The case will be considered for acceptance in January 2023.
Don’t get your hopes up. All cases submitted for acceptance are considered. This case will be rejected for a hearing; you can bet your last dollar on it
BTTT
The Court clerk's office time stamped the Petition, as it does all similar filings, but the Court has taken no action whatever with regard to the Petition and will probably dismiss it without comment (as it does 98% of all Petitions filed).
I must admit, your pessimism is impressive.
...and will probably dismiss it without comment
The only problem with probably is the improbable.
Now, inevitable, there's a word for you.
Curious.
...I'd bet my last/bottom dollar on it.
Isn't it?
That's not what the video said.
I don't know the law in this case; but someone else here may know if SCOTUS can decide on the question of whether the accused did break their oaths (assuming that is actionable), without the High Court having to be the ones to exact the consequences asked for in the case (that all those hundreds of individuals step down)?
Could SCOTUS refer the consequences over to the House, or the Sergeant at Arms of the Senate? I have no idea.
I'm almost sad that I read this, which gives hope, when it is so likely to be unanswered in the present swampadoodle. But it would seem that more than a handful of those named in the suit will no longer be in office after January; so the destabilization of the government would not be quite as severe. Or, the court could order some stages of discovery that would scare many others into stepping down, when the truth is about to come out from emails or other evidence.
Asking God's favor on this pleading.
I must admit, your pessimism is impressive.
When I read that, I had a different thought about that conclusion but I must give you credit for replying in a thoughtful, kind way.
If the DimWITS had that level of pessimism, they never would have attempted the massive election fraud that has been carried out in the last MANY ELECTIONS because nobody with any level of insight would ever have thought the massive fraud would have been successful.
Surely our laws and voting tradition would have exposed the cheating. But it didn't. So this case might bring the DimWITS whole house of cards down on them.
Maybe!
Don’t misunderstand me. I strongly believe the case should be heard. I’ve requested cert on two cases in which my constitutional rights were blatantly violated. Was denied cert both times.
There was no urgency that required immediate action. There was time to take a pause and look at the evidence by the complete legislative body of Congress. They chose to not do so. Therefore, they violated their oath of office:
“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3
Thus, having not take the time out to investigate further the allegation of foreign interference of an election, especially one that involves the presidency, is a clear violation of the oath administered to support this Constitution. For nothing is a more serious threat to this nation than a foreign actor interfering with the election of the highest office holder in the nation.
If the Supreme Court does indeed refuse to vote in favor of this this civil suit, every American should stand up and decry their failure to also honor the oath they took to support this constitution.
BTTT
HEAR, HEAR!
IMO, anybody AGAINST the SC going through with this is declaring themselves a domestic enemy of the Republic as well.
THAT is why the MSM isn't touching this. They sure aren't defending them are they. Their bestest buddies for life are about to get smoked from office and their response is CRUSHING silence.
LMAOAPIMP
They take no sides either way, yet their silence itself is acquiescence of the misdeed of breaking their Oath of Office through their omission of reporting.
Take a stand, MSM. It's out there...you never even HAD this narrative to run with. The American People have the narrative now.
Cut and dry. Patriot or...what...lukewarm? Undecided?
Thank you for the ping
In the latest news, there's a conspiracy nut...excuse me...a
right wing conspiracy nut with a case at the Supreme Court...
/MSM impression
Where in the Constitution can I find this “requirement to investigate”?
One tells ten and they each tell 10 more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.