Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The US Supreme Court Case that Could Change Everything
Golden Age of Gaia ^ | 11/26/2022 | Suzanne Maresca

Posted on 11/28/2022 12:34:49 PM PST by nikos1121

From the website ralandbrunson.com, updated as of November 23, 2022

Background ~

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote.

What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a “Complaint” and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants.

Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy’s lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland’s lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS.

The events of both lawsuits [from March 23, 2021 to November 23, 2022] can be seen at https://ralandbrunson.com/


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: election; hh2; lawsuit; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: nikos1121

Bttt.

5.56mm


41 posted on 11/28/2022 1:05:10 PM PST by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho got to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
I have no idea, but the fact that they’ve agreed to hear it, amazes me.

SCOTUS hasn't agrees to hear anything, and won't hear this. As long as the paperwork follows the legally required format, the clerk will accept it for filing, but that is ALL that has happened.

Do not get up any hopes for this. It is absolutely doomed to fail on multiple levels.

42 posted on 11/28/2022 1:05:46 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
"The lawsuit claims that Congress did not uphold it’s oath of office and did not investigate."

Members of Congress have failed to uphold their oath of office so many times in the past, it would be a singular change in direction if they ever would uphold their oath of office.

43 posted on 11/28/2022 1:06:04 PM PST by Carl Vehse (A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Then why have they agreed to listen to the arguments and vote whether or not to hear the case? Why didn’t they dismiss it altogether?

I’m not the only one asking this. Several legal scholars were on TV this past weekend amazed that the SCOTUS is contemplating it.

The new House, will uncover the scandal in our government. It runs so deep, and we know here that the RINOs are just as bad as the democrats.

I”ve been depressed since the election of 2020. I can’t believe what is happening with our elections.

IT used to be one day, not 60 days to elect someone.


44 posted on 11/28/2022 1:07:31 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

It’s on the docket because the losers below paid the fee and filed the petition. Just like thousands of others that get denied. Getting on the docket is the equivalent of winning a participation trophy.


45 posted on 11/28/2022 1:10:27 PM PST by PatriotarchyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

curiouser and curiouser...

again, we shall see.


46 posted on 11/28/2022 1:11:17 PM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Sod Off, Swampy, as the old saying goes.


47 posted on 11/28/2022 1:19:30 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

That is the point, Biden was not elected, the election was stolen. That is why none of the people listed in the law suit are elected. Trump is still the President because he won the 2020 election. Our entire government is run by crooks. I have been watching this all play out since 2017!! Do some research and you will find the truth.


48 posted on 11/28/2022 1:20:34 PM PST by sibb1213
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Another poster says it has been accepted for review. As are 10,000 cases a year. And most of those will never even be looked at by a single Supreme Court Justice. Their clerks weed out most of them.

If 4 justices have agreed to accept it, THEN it is a huge deal.


49 posted on 11/28/2022 1:21:44 PM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Whether it flies or not, my hat is off to them for trying. It beats the nothing everyone else (including me) has done. May the Almighty give the SCOTI the courage to do the right thing for once.


50 posted on 11/28/2022 1:24:49 PM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
What about their other brother Deron?
51 posted on 11/28/2022 1:26:52 PM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

The original website says the Supreme Court has received the case. Per the website: “Petition docketed! (The clerk of the Court tells Raland that they have everything they need.)”

Then (23 Nov): “Good news! Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit...”

No, that is not “good news”. It means the Solicitor General is so certain the case will NOT be heard that she isn’t even going to waste time filing a response!


52 posted on 11/28/2022 1:27:25 PM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: thinden
Here is the link to last week's thread:

possible removal of asitting President and Vice President of the United Statesalong with members of the United States Congress (SCOTUS req for certiorari)

Here are the keywords: election2020; electionfraud2020; elections; insidejoke; scotus; supremes;

Probably hard to search for it, since the link is to SCOTUS itself, and the title of the thread is from another source, given that the link does not have a good 'FR' title to use.

53 posted on 11/28/2022 1:27:30 PM PST by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

What relief are they asking for? I can’t see anything substantive being done even if they win.


54 posted on 11/28/2022 1:29:19 PM PST by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
2 points:

First, regarding this statement: "I don't think a Supreme Court (or any other court) has the constitutional authority to remove an elected member from office..."

The appropriate argument to this would be that the usurper was not duly elected, but assumed the office as a result of demonstrable fraud. That said... point #2:

Second point: the lawsuit alleges that Congress failed its duty when it declined to investigate. However, even if the brothers win their case and SCOTUS orders Congress to investigate then we all know what would happen: Congress collectively would make a statement to the effect of "there's nothing to see here" and declares the "investigation" to be over.

It's frustrating, but until somebody can actually provably win any election fraud case in a lower court (let's get that going, Arizona), that's the way it's gonna be.

55 posted on 11/28/2022 1:30:08 PM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
"I am surprised that this has not been posted. This could be huge."

Well, "I" was certainly unaware of it, and I try to follow the news closely. I am amazed that Congress refused to investigate by such a margin.

56 posted on 11/28/2022 1:30:23 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (Not Responding to Seagull Snark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Then why have they agreed to listen to the arguments and vote whether or not to hear the case? Why didn’t they dismiss it altogether?

They haven't. The petitioner filed for a writ of certiorari, which is discretionary review at SCOTUS. If four justices vote to hear the case, the court hears the case. Otherwise, the case is over.

The new House, will uncover the scandal in our government. It runs so deep, and we know here that the RINOs are just as bad as the democrats.

SCOTUS may know that the genie will be out of the bottle soon if the House holds hearing. So, maybe now they will hear a case. But, maybe not.
57 posted on 11/28/2022 1:31:57 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sibb1213
That is the point, Biden was not elected, the election was stolen. That is why none of the people listed in the law suit are elected. Trump is still the President because he won the 2020 election. Our entire government is run by crooks. I have been watching this all play out since 2017!! Do some research and you will find the truth.

Sorry, but that's not what the Constitution says. Once the oath has been administered, Biden is President. The Constitution lists all of the ways Biden can be forcibly removed from office, none of which includes the courts.

We must respect the Constitution above all else, no matter how that affects how we might want things to work out. The various states certified their elections and presented their slate of Electoral College Electors. The Senate accepted these certifications, and counted the votes from the Electors. You say the election was stolen. I say the election was stolen. But the Constitution says the process was followed, and Biden was sworn in as President.

That is why all U.S. oaths of office include the words "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

We start altering elections ex post facto and before you know it we'll be swearing in Al Gore because he "won" in 2000, and every President since were illegitimate.

58 posted on 11/28/2022 1:33:23 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Nino'sCorner did an interview with one of the Brunson's - Loy, within the last day or two. About an hour long, with a TON of information... to the point I believe this does indeed have legs.

It is not yet up, as it will be on Rumble - Ninoscorner

I have a copy of the interview that I got off Telegram.

There was another interview of Raland that I viewed over the weekend. There may be a link to that in the other thread.

59 posted on 11/28/2022 1:34:50 PM PST by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: algore

The court won’t... there will be a process. Discussed on the Nonoscorner interview. The process is somewhat speculative. I think it will involve the military, but there are many paths of possibilities. See the interviews...


60 posted on 11/28/2022 1:36:47 PM PST by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson