[Alberta's Child]

“Those state legislatures didn’t do their damn jobs (which directly effects other states)”

That is a terrible argument to make in support of a legal challenge in an election. The Federal courts did America a huge favor by dismissing all those legal challenges on the basis that the states filing the lawsuits lacked standing to challenge the election procedures in other states. Any Federal court that took up such a case and ruled on it would inevitably be forced to abrogate the authority of state governments and establish uniform voting standards across the entire country. And I can assure you that the national standard would be the loosest, fraud-prone processes of states like California and Washington — not a tight standard at all.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "Federal courts did America a huge favor by dismissing all those legal challenges on the basis that the states filing the lawsuits lacked standing to challenge the election procedures in other states"

I agree. That should've been brought up by the legislators on Jan 6 and 7th. Which they did and the president of the Senate allowed a stacked vote against them and a false flag that disrupted the objection.

president of the Senate had two jobs which was to set up an orderly meeting an make sure a legal vote take place.
I believe he intentionally failed on both accounts.

Here was the real set up. After Jan 6 Trump should've taken the stacked vote issue to the supreme court. But he couldn't as "his" people are the ones accused of disrupting the objections.