To: Alberta's Child
said, "Federal courts did America a huge favor by dismissing all those legal challenges on the basis that the states filing the lawsuits lacked standing to challenge the election procedures in other states"
I agree. That should've been brought up by the legislators on Jan 6 and 7th. Which they did and the president of the Senate allowed a stacked vote against them and a false flag that disrupted the objection.
president of the Senate had two jobs which was to set up an orderly meeting an make sure a legal vote take place.
I believe he intentionally failed on both accounts.
Here was the real set up. After Jan 6 Trump should've taken the stacked vote issue to the supreme court. But he couldn't as "his" people are the ones accused of disrupting the objections.
71 posted on
11/26/2022 7:35:35 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
After Jan 6 Trump should've taken the stacked vote issue to the supreme court. He didn’t take it to the Supreme Court because he would have been laughed out of the courtroom over his inability to explain what the hell a “stacked vote” is. Do you really think there was a single member of the Senate or House who would testify that he/she was forced to vote a certain way against his or her wishes? LOL.
You are delusional, dude.
72 posted on
11/26/2022 9:35:34 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson