Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: John S Mosby
But the current Electoral Act provides for the Congress to object to the slate of Electors “selected” by illegal acts under their own State Constitutions.

This is why the current Electoral Act is almost certainly unconstitutional. If Congress could reject electors from a state (presuming there are no competing electors submitted for that state), then you have basically turned the U.S. into a parliamentary government where the executive branch leader is selected by Congress. You’d have Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi objecting to Wyoming’s three electors (for example) because one dude from a Shoshone Indian reservation claims he wasn’t able to vote.

53 posted on 11/25/2022 6:22:56 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
said, "the executive branch leader is selected by Congress"

no. again the objection was based around state legislators getting a chance to over see the rules. Which other legislators attempting to give them that chance.

The term here is an out of control technocracy
(which means: A government or social system controlled by technicians, especially scientists and technical experts)
56 posted on 11/25/2022 9:21:34 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson