[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "the executive branch leader is selected by Congress"

no. again the objection was based around state legislators getting a chance to over see the rules. Which other legislators attempting to give them that chance.

The term here is an out of control technocracy
(which means: A government or social system controlled by technicians, especially scientists and technical experts)

[Alberta's Child]

no. again the objection was based around state legislators getting a chance to over see the rules. Which other legislators attempting to give them that chance.

Your whole premise here is preposterous. It is ludicrous for members of Congress from Texas (for example) to object to electoral votes certified by Pennsylvania (for example) on the grounds that Pennsylvania failed to follow the laws established by its legislature … when Pennsylvania’s own legislature never made any such objection.

The U.S. constitution was written for a collection of sovereign states. This idea that one state would take it upon itself to interpret and enforce the laws of another state is ludicrous.