All true. But the current Electoral Act provides for the Congress to object to the slate of Electors “selected” by illegal acts under their own State Constitutions. Get your point,but there were 141 formal motions filed objecting to the approval (the “rubber stamp” the “brave” Pence provided instead of following Parliamentary Congressional procedures and hearing the objections. Said number of objections so accepted by the body in voting at the session— the approval could not have happened.)
Take a look at the crap the dems in the lame duck are trying to ram through for biden’s signature— closing the elements of the 1885 Electoral Act so NO objections may be heard on January 6th joint Session). Pence bumped elbows with... of all people Nantzi Pelosi-—something Constitutionalists will never forget. The snake— they lying tootie snake in the bag all 4 years he had a duty to clean up the federal election process right down to the Jan 6th “formality” which should have been a days long procedure—not a rubber stamp. Pence should get a job as a airline ticket taker— useless turd.
This is why the current Electoral Act is almost certainly unconstitutional. If Congress could reject electors from a state (presuming there are no competing electors submitted for that state), then you have basically turned the U.S. into a parliamentary government where the executive branch leader is selected by Congress. You’d have Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi objecting to Wyoming’s three electors (for example) because one dude from a Shoshone Indian reservation claims he wasn’t able to vote.