[Steve Van Doorn]

i said, "Jan 6 she(speaker of the house) only allowed 11 republicans on the floor using "covid" rules.
That alone didn't allow Trump to get a quorum"
They're required to be on the floor to accept their vote.

said, "Everything that was done in Congress on January 6th was fully compliant with the Electoral Count Act of 1887"

That is true if 11 >= 286 (For a majority)
If 11 is greater then 286 then they did comply with the electoral count act of 1887.
Other wise it was a Coup d'état

Again the objection wasn't based if they should count the vote or not.
The Objection made which was, "all of the known circumstances, regularly given."
Referring to covid rules which the state legislators didn't get a vote on. Which obviously they didn't.
Then the breach took place making even less "regular circumstances"

[Alberta's Child]

I don’t know why you keep bringing up the number 11. There were around 400 House votes on every measure that came up that day.

And the state legislatures in question had every opportunity to fix — or even override — the election processes in their own states, but refused to do so. Even something as simple as sending a competing slate of electors would have made a huge difference. That doesn’t make any of this a matter for Congress (or the VP) to decide.