[Alberta's Child]

I don’t know why you keep bringing up the number 11. There were around 400 House votes on every measure that came up that day.

And the state legislatures in question had every opportunity to fix — or even override — the election processes in their own states, but refused to do so. Even something as simple as sending a competing slate of electors would have made a huge difference. That doesn’t make any of this a matter for Congress (or the VP) to decide.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "There were around 400 House votes on every measure that came up that day"

Yes there where. Though to legally count their vote they must be on the floor. If the speaker of the house didn't agree with the vote she could disregard the vote as not recognized.
IE: Coup d'état.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "state legislatures in question had every opportunity to fix — or even override — the election processes in their own states"

remember Jan 6 and 7th is the only time states are allowed to question other states vote count. Before then a state could turn in that they have a billion votes and they can recount their votes and still get a billion votes in a country with 350 million people.

Reminder voter turn out was over 50% greater then the largest turnout in US history of 2008. When 1% change makes or brakes elections. It was a statistical impossibility.