Posted on 07/05/2022 4:54:23 PM PDT by bitt
Some highly puzzling messages were leaked to The Daily Caller from Cassidy Hutchinson reaching out to CPAC, the Conservatives Political Action Conference, for assistance with her “BS” subpoena from the Jan. 6th committee. But what does it mean?
To be honest, I’m not entirely sure, but it confirms a lot of things, and simultaneously raises A LOT of questions. For starters, why the hell is Cassidy Hutchinson reaching out to the conservative Mecca of CPAC, for help with Jan. 6th subpoena? Why would she seek conservative help if her plan was to go up there and fabricate nonsense about Trump. That doesn’t make any sense.
The way I see it, here are the 3 possible scenarios as to WHY Cassidy Hutchinson would reach out to conservatives for help:
1) Hutchinson was looking to infiltrate CPAC lawyers to get information on Jan. 6th defendants, or information to help in her smear testimony against Trump and make CPAC look bad by association. She was looking to sow division and is operating as an agent for the Dems.
2) Hutchinson didn’t want to be involved in the “BS” Jan. 6th hearings, but she was being pressured by the Dems to testify. She was sure to mention that US Marshalls, who are armed at all times, showed up to her house to issue the subpoena. So perhaps she was feeling intimidated or scared about the whole situation. Maybe she’s an unwilling participant in this sham and is being blackmailed or threatened by the Dems.
3) This is a white hat operation to bait the Dems to irrationally subpoena Cassidy Hutchinson, who claims to have the goods to bring down Trump, only for her testimony to be a colossal disaster and exonerate Trump. She’s an agent for Trump/White Hats and is playing a part to deal significant damage to the Dems and their “insurrection” narrative while simultaneously waking up normies.
She’s either involved in one of the two “sides” in this war, or she’s neutral and doesn’t know how she got in this situation and wanted out. Regardless of which option it is, this CONFIRMS that whatever “testimony” she presented is not to be taken at face value and something much deeper is going on here. None of which will reflect well on the Dems.
As for me, I’m leaning heavily to option 3. Simply too much damage being done to the Dems and the left-wing narrative to be an accident. Also Hutchinson reminds me of something we’ve seen many times before. How many people have we seen claiming to have the goods to bring Trump down, only to fall flat on their faces and exonerate Trump? Avenatti, Stormi, Omarosa. All of these similar characters did nothing but discredit the Dems and exonerate Trump. While simultaneously gathering the attention of left-wing media, therefore waking up the sheep to their dishonesty.
Also consider the timing of these “message leaks”. She’s been headline news for how many days now? And whoever had these texts waited until NOW to release them? AFTER the Dems have gone all-in on support for Hutchinson and her comical testimony.
Whether Hutchinson is directly working for the white hats or not, the result of this little stunt only benefitted Trump, and highly damaged the Dems. It makes them look even more dishonest and gimmicky, right in the prime months leading to the mid terms.
If the Deep State were pulling the strings, we wouldn’t see them fumbling this badly.
-Clandestine
https://dailycaller.com/2022/07/03/obtained-text-message-cassidy-hutchinson-called-january-6-committee-bs-before-testifying/
p
4) She’s a flake.
I’m with you. When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras
Right off the top of my head, to implicate CPAC as anti-Trump? Imagine the MSM wall-to-wall reporting and spin of that!
Peter Navarro said that Mark Meadows came in with 5 YOUNG WOMEN when he was made CoS.....these young girls have been DEMOCRAT SPIES from what Cassidy and Alyssa have shown themselves to be.
Hey MARK....YOU ARE EASILY SWAYED BY YOUNG WOMEN! DUMBASS!
Yes on War Room Bannon said they all referred to Mark Meadows as having a “harem” because he liked to hire young pretty women and give them important titles. . .
But “I” expect today’s national press corpse to hear horses, expect zebras, and write up unicorns. Then get trampled by rhinos.
How I got to the top.
“WHY”
To drive the citizenry insane, angry, divided, confused, malleable and dead.
Oh...I had NO idea!!! Until yesterday I thouhgt Meadows was an OK WUSS.
just like his boss
If she was unwillingly subpoenaed then it’s entirely possible that she was in fact told those lies by either a secret service agent or someone pretending to be one.
Thus the democrats set her up to testify to that they planted themselves.
Why don’t we know who told her this stuff?
She’s not that smart. She saw a chance for fame, and got coached by the Dems. There was no risk to her.
A lot of conservative jumped on the band wagon. This guy Andrew McCArthy, couldn’t wait to back the gal’s testimony, if you want to call it that.
Steve Hayes, George Will, Peggy Noonan etc. They all believed this lady.
I really wonder why Meadows took the job outside
spying on Trump .
She had a turd to drop and she dropped it. No effort will be made to defend her now.
Yeah, she’s a flake who got in over her head and her new lawyer carefully coached her “testimony” to avoid issues of perjury when she fabricated and reported phoney conversations.
Why are we even talking about this. Everything she said was hearsay, it’s not admissible in any court even in the court of public opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.