Posted on 06/27/2022 7:29:47 AM PDT by Rummyfan
“I suggest a sex strike. It is no longer safe to have sex in America, so therefore you withhold it. Sleep with women. Let’s go for it. Let’s advocate for some false lesbianism,” TikTok user EmilyScott1990 proposed.
As recent history has shown us, when modern-day “feminists” don’t get their way, absolute foolishness inevitably ensues. And that’s exactly what happened in the aftermath of the decision announced Friday in which a majority of Justices on the Supreme Court agreed that Roe v. Wade must be struck down.
The ruling caused the Usual Suspects on the left including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) to use what we’ve been reliably told over the last year and a half is “inciteful” language in calls for people to get “into the streets” and “fight” in “defiance” of the Supreme Court. Biden administration DOJ Attorney General Merrick Garland sounded a little “insurrectiony” in a statement where he declared his department would do whatever they could to minimize the impact of the ruling.
Feminist mobs on Twitter and at some “protests” took a different approach, however, with some calling for a “sex strike” in response to the ruling, believing it was “no longer safe” for women to have sex in America, and thinking sex strikes would be especially effective if women withheld it from male elected officials....
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
The ones calling for sex strike are too ugly and angry to have sex anyway——virtue signaling.
Good.
These are exactly the anti-family, “progessive” types that we don’t want reproducing.
Yeah, because anyone wants to have sex with a feminist.
News flash, women like sex too…
What guy in his right mind would even have sex with someone like that?
Doubt that very many feminists have heterosexual sex. Its entirely fitting and appropriate that some women for whatever reason don’t procreate.
Female persons: your terms are acceptable.
The correct question is how many beers?
As long as there are prostitutes sex strikes can never be totally effective.
Irony can be so, ironic. Okay, so we’re going to stop having promiscuous, unprotected sex because we can’t get abortions. Do you think the clue will sink in? Or does it need application with a 2x4?
Great news!
Let me encourage you to be strong in your advocacy!
This is an excellent way for them not to need abortion services. I say we encourage them, as it is an excellent way to avoid pregnancy!
It sounds like the lesbians won’t be “getting any” for a long time. ROTFL!!!
Feminist that have no chance of a loving relationship and have ZERO chance of getting laid propose a sex strike.
Fixed.
Oh no. Stop. Don’t.
That’ll show us.
I’d pass out before being sufficiently drunk ...
Oh heck, they can’t even decide who is a woman these days
Hey, sounds great. If they didn’t spread their legs for every Tom, Ricardo and DeVontre, they wouldn’t have to murder babies.
Since God ordained abstinence as the way to avoid unwanted pregnancy since the beginning of time, it is amazing that all roads eventually lead to the truth. The irony is completely lost on these godless fools I’m sure.
I say please abstain! We don’t need any more of you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.