Posted on 06/14/2022 7:43:59 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
During their sham one-sided hearing the Jan. 6 Committee shared their interview with former AG Bill Barr who was seen laughing hysterically when he was asked about the evidence of voter fraud presented by “2000 Mules” during his pre-recorded testimony at the Jan 6 show trial.
Bill Barr: “Uh, the election was not stolen by fraud. And I haven’t seen anything since the election that changes my mind on that, including the ‘2000 Mules’ movie. (laughing) In a nutshell. the GBI[Georgia Bureau of Investigation] was unimpressed with it and I was similarly unimpressed with it because I was holding my fire on that see what the photographic evidence was. I thought, well hell, if they have a lot of photographs of the same person dumping a lot of ballots in different boxes, that’s hard to explain. So I wanted to see what the photographic evidence was. The cellphone data is singularly unimpressive. Basically, if you take 2 million cellphones and figure out where they are physically in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, by definition, you’re going to find many hundreds of them that have passed by and spent time in the vicinity these boxes. And the premise that if you go by five boxes or whatever it was, that that’s a mule, is indefensible.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Traitor, sure, but Barr's not in even a little denial.
"Basically, if you take 2 million cellphones and figure out where they are physically in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, by definition, you’re going to find many hundreds of them that have passed by and spent time in the vicinity these boxes. And the premise that if you go by five boxes or whatever it was, that that’s a mule, is indefensible.”
What he's doing is signaling to the Deep State that he is playing dumb...just exactly as Mueller played dumb, and how Cankles tried and failed to play dumb regarding her server wipe.
As Hoft added, it's a cinch Barr never saw 2000 Mules, just maybe the trailer. So Barr bullshits "or whatever it was". Well, "whatever it was" nullfies the point Barr thought he was making!
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Five times is enemy action in the bare act of illegal ballot stuffing. Period. Paragraph.
All Barr wants is to be cut out of the invest file, just as Mueller did. Remember when NBC correspondent Mike Viqueira confronted Mueller outside Mueller's church? Did anyone else ever try that again? Barr's got the same Deep State deal - "I'll throw Trump under the Deep State bus six ways to Sunday just like Schumer promised, just leave me alone."
I take it Mr. Haughty Swamp Creature can’t explain away 2000 Mules.
Absurd. Trump didn't lose, why should he bend to submit to the coup?!
"because he was made personally too unpopular"
Soooo "unpopular" he garnered the highest popular vote total in American history: 74,216,154.
YES....ALL SWAMP CREATURES!! .
Not sure what else Trump expected from this H.W. Bush re-tread. As usual his own personnel picks did him in.
Proof, evidence, indications. There certainly are plenty of indications of likely fraud. The indications certainly warrant investigations to find more evidence, but that there was voter fraud that changed the result of the election is very hard to prove.
I meant “the mail-in ballots.”
Yes. The Sept. 30, 2021 letter from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to True the Vote, if legitimate and accurate, answers the obvious question that D'Souza avoids answering in the film: How close did a mule's phone have to come to a ballot dropoff box to be counted as a visit? D'Souza NEVER says, for example, "If a mule's phone came within three feet of a ballot box, we counted that as a visit." He never provides a number.
Why not?
The letter from the GBI to TTV answers that question:
https://twitter.com/stphnfwlr/status/1451309892824936452
Acccording to the GBI, True the Vote only required that a suspected mule's phone come within 100 feet of a ballot drop box or "stash house" to be counted as a visit. 100 FEET!
The GBI says, "As it exists, the data, while curious, does not rise to the level of probable cause that a crime has been committed."
True the Vote has had plenty of time to declare that the letter from the GBI is inaccurate, either in the film or on the frequently asked questions page of the TTV 2000 Mules web page:
https://www.truethevote.org/ttv-2000mules-faqs/
It is still possible that TTV's mule hypothesis is correct. Possible does not mean probable.
Did you see the movie?
It is actual video evidence. Not speculation, not conjecture... Actual video evidence, and the calculation showing JUST these 2000 ‘mules’ could create enough fraud to overturn the election.
And there were not jut 2000 mules, there were 50,000 - they were very strict in limiting valid data. (ie: someone had to go back and forth to a distribution center and a ballot box more than 35 times)
And they did not just live there and ‘pass by’ the box, they stopped, stuffed ballots, removed their gloves, took a picture of themselves at the ballot box (like the doordash drivers do when they drop off your food)
So... DID YOU BOTHER TO WATCH IT?
250 million? Whose sending money?
Bill Barr, the Bushie who stood down to enable the Dems to execute the 2020 Big Steal.
No more RINOs, and definitely, no more BUSHIES!
Showing that someone's phone came within 100 feet of a ballot box is obviously not proof that the phone's owner actually used that ballot box. A prosecutor who pretends otherwise in court will be laughed out of the room and/or sued for malicious prosecution.
He is a liar, and never watched 2000 mules. I would bet on that. He never looked at a bit of evidence, he missed the RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA and Hunter Biden scandals by gawd.
And this guy was our attorney general?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.