The COVID con is all the Democrats have

American Thinker.com ^ | December 30, 2021 | Drew Allen

[Kaslin]

In 2019, President Trump’s prospects of winning re-election in 2020 seemed all but guaranteed. An April 28, 2019 Politico headline summed up why: “Dems sweat Trump’s economy: We don’t really have a robust national message right now.” Of course they had no message. Trump’s economy had gone gangbusters.

In Trump’s economy the poverty rate hit an all-time low. More Americans were employed than ever before. The unemployment rate fell to a 50-year low. This, in addition to the 7 million new jobs created. Middle class family incomes had also risen more than five times higher than the previous 8 years under Obama.

Trump had also triumphed over the myriad Democrat party hoaxes aimed at subverting the will of the American people and overturning the 2016 election results: the Trump-Russia collusion hoax and the failed quid pro quo impeachment, for example.

Leading up to 2020, the Democrats had already thrown everything plus the kitchen sink at Trump. They were empty handed. Even as late as November 2019, the Democrats were “increasingly worried that their large and divided presidential field” didn’t “have what it [took] to beat President Donald Trump” in 2020.

Democrats were desperate for something to campaign on. While they never found a robust national campaign message to campaign on, they did find a message to campaign against: COVID.

In the first presidential debate, Joe Biden claimed that Trump had no plan for the COVID response. This was an abject lie. Trump had gone above and beyond to respond to the pandemic.

When Trump restricted travel from China, Biden denounced the move as xenophobic.

When then-New York Governor Cuomo requested a Navy hospital ship to treat COVID patients in March 2020, Trump sent the 1,000 bed Comfort to New York City. A month later, Cuomo told Trump it wasn’t needed.

[kosciusko51]

There is a difference between a company requiring masks and a state-mandated mask.

Furthermore, I should not have my breathing restricted just because you feel unsafe. Your health is your responsibility, not mine. And life is unsafe. If you cannot deal with that, perhaps you should hide safely at home, and let freedom-loving people get on with their lives.

[metmom]

Outdoor boilers are horrid.

Mr. mm who does energy engineering, has investigated them and they are hideously inefficient and polluting. Every one that I have ever seen is pouring out massive amounts of smoke.

I get the concept, but if there are any on the market that are worth it, they are priced beyond what most people could afford.

That said, I am not in favor of the government banning stuff left and right.

And if this goes to include fireplaces, regular wood fired boilers, wood stoves, well, NY is a lost cause. They are already banning natural gas in places.

NY simply does not have a climate conducive for survival without some sort of heat. They are really trying to play catch up with CA much to the detriment of NYers.

[metmom]

BTW, my understanding about the firewood has to do with trying to stop the spread of Emerald Ash Borers.

[CodeToad]

Total ignorant nonsense. Did you say that for the flu or common cold? If you are so scared and such a germaphobe you are free to stay home, but you have no right to demand the rest of us participate in your mental illness and delusions.

[CodeToad]

” When this virus is rampant public and government venues should be forced to require masks.”

Masks stop nothing. They are a political tool only. Covid showed how utter retarded and uneducated the population is to believe masks stop viruses.

[nagant]

Total ignorant nonsense. Did you say that for the flu or common cold? If you are so scared and such a germaphobe you are free to stay home, but you have no right to demand the rest of us participate in your mental illness and delusions.
~~~~

Said a guy who’s afraid of masks and vaccinations to the point of paranoia.

[kosciusko51]

👏

[bagster]

Hmmmm. First you say this....

Wrong. The Democrats’ most dangerous weapon in creating COVID-19 lies in pitting anti-vaxer Republicans against pro-vaccination conservatives.

Then you say this....

Trump is responsible for saving thousands of lives with his vaccines. When you look at the most avid anti-vaxers you’re looking at Democrats.

I'll admit, I'm at a loss. But what can a poor boy to do
except to sing in a rock 'n roll band.

Also, you're completely wrong. The most adamant government vaxxers are, of course, democrats, liberals, progressives, statists, establishment rinos, and derp state members of every stripe. Anti-vax does not live in the House of Derp.

Liberty loving patriots and real conservatives understand and therefore we resist. Anti-vax is on the Freedom Agenda.

What newspapers are YOU reading?

[Roccus]

Wrong. The Democrats’ most dangerous weapon in creating COVID-19 lies in pitting anti-vaxer Republicans against pro-vaccination conservatives

EVEN MORE WRONG! Their most potent weapon is the ability to convince people that one's own personal medical choice is an identifier of one's political bent.

[CodeToad]

“Afraid” is stupid conclusion. We prefer not to do stupid things. I also don’t hit my thumbs with hammers but that doesn’t mean I am afraid of hammers.

If masks work then why is covid still here and why haven’t those not wearing masks died off yet?? You cannot answer those things because you have made covid a psychoses and a project that entertains you.

I can see you dumb you are and how that causes your complete participation with covid.

[nagant]

Somebody like you goes around running red lights ....”What about my FREEDOM?”

[CodeToad]

“Somebody like you goes around running red lights”

I don’t know what makes you so stupid but it really works. You’re a typical liberal type that says outrageous things to get attention.

Bye, Sunshine.

[jeffc]

"As with all things, you’re freedom ends where my nose begins."

Than it's you that needs to mask up, not forcing those around you to wear masks. It's called individual responsibility and personal FREEDOM.

I'm not sure I care for your type of "conservatism"...

[nagant]

Governments everywhere should be forced to do away with laws, because every stinking one of them restricts someone’s FREEDOM.

Funny, isn’t it, how every state run by Republicans still have MOUNTAINS of laws which restrict someone’s freedom? You would think true conservatives everywhere would think like you, and eliminate their laws.

[LiveFree99]

The idiot governor of Massachusetts, Charkie Baker, said in November 2020 that if everyone would just wear a mask for 30 days then the Covid problem would go away. Yes, he apparently really believed that.

[CodeToad]

The same “it’s my nose so you have to wear a mask to protect my nose” liberals repeat the same lunacy about guns, “I have the right not to get shot by your gun.”

They never see the stupidity of their argument that everyone else must protect their nose, that it is their nose and they must protect it, not the rest of us.

They also fail to know that viruses live everywhere and not just come rom other human, so how are they going to protect from all that? A silly and useless mask? It makes them “feeeeel’ better.

[HandBasketHell]

Covid gave the Democrats the pretext for the cheat-by-mail-in ballots.

Trump was in the lead until the counting was simultaneously stopped in 5 states and the counting of the mail-in proceeded until they found enough to put Biden over the edge.

Democrats can only win with cheat-by-mail-in ballots. Therefore, the Covid con must continue for the 2022 Midterms.

Only problem is that even the Sheeple are starting to see that Covid was not the Black Plague that the Dems said it was, and the "vaccines" that we are mandated to take (no confidence SCOTUS will strike them down) don't work and may very well kill you.

[ealgeone]

It’s interesting how this virus shows up just when they needed it most.

China as well....but then again...I repeat myself.

[Amendment10]

"When you look at the most avid anti-vaxers you’re looking at Democrats."

---

Respectfully nagant, emphasizing that I'm not medically trained, please consider the following about the CV19 jab.

The unconstitutional (imo) EUA law, excerpted below, gives people the right to not only be officially informed about pros and cons of experimental CV19 mRNA jabs, but also officially informed about alternatives to the jabs, before making decision about getting jabbed, the Democrats not satisfying those rights.

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (excerpted)

"(e) Conditions of authorization

(1) Unapproved product

(A) Required conditions

(i)...

(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—

(I) that the Secretary [Secretary of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;

(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and

(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks [emphases added]."

Again, the reality is that people have probably been getting mixed, disturbing messages about alleged problems with experimental CV19 mRNA jabs. So people are understandably taking a caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) stance on getting jabbed, especially where harassment for not getting a jab is concerned.

• Study Reveals That Unjabbed Are Better Informed Than Jabbed (12.27.21)

• The Nuremberg Code, ‘Informed Consent’ and Vaccine Mandates (11.10.21)

• “People Are Genuinely Trying To Make An Informed Decision” – Why Vaccine Giveaways & “Freebies” Don’t Work (8.11.21)

• Can The Government Inject Anything Into Our Veins Without Our informed Consent (7.29.21)

• MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated' (7.17.21)

Finally, as a consequence of what is seemingly growing evidence of poorly planned, poorly executed, alleged vote counting fraud by Democrats to steal 2020 elections, Democrats had arguably destroyed their credibility before they took over management of government-promoted jabs, foolishly bullying everybody to get jabbed. So a growing number of people understandably aren't “buying” what Democrats are trying to “sell” them concerning election or jabs imo.

[Gaffer]

I agree that President Trump did everything possible he could in the face of massive attempts to invalidate his 2016 election and steal the 2020 election. I do not, however, believe that the preponderance of ‘anti-vaxxers’ are Democrats.