Posted on 10/14/2021 5:01:26 PM PDT by Mount Athos
I’m not sure how OSHA could justify applying this rule to fully remote employees. Rumor has it that they won’t be, but we’ll just have to see, I guess.
Biden doesn’t need no steeking constitution!
This is just comical and ridiculous. I expect even our pro vax FR team see that we are way out of our minds. Experimental treatment takes understanding and agreement. We are now demanding people agree under threat of punishment that people submit to this experiment. EUA is an experimental treatment. I don’t care where you stand on the vax but our neighbors will need help because they will be deplatformed from life. Support your family/friends/neighbor on this.
I could never have thought this would be the ploy. If I wrote a book 24 months ago people would have laughed at it as unbelievable.
A republic, if you can keep it..
If your employer is cowardice, give them a fake card, collect paychecks, pay off your debt, recruit like minded folks, live free.
Well gee Wally, that sounds an awful lot like recovery time for the vax. Sure, we'll give you some time off to recover from your myocardits and fedgov is even going to make us pay you for that time. We hope for a speedy recovery(or death).
Evil begats evil Mr president
Because the title of the article makes one think that the mandate has been published and is enforceable.
I notice that the OSHA rule gets submitted to the Office of Management and Budget — a creature of congress. Maybe that’s the fig leaf for legislative approval, or maybe it just needs to be ‘scored’ for economic costs. Either way this is a huge conceptual leap regarding OSHA authority.
It says to protect other employees...
They don’t need protection if you have overwhelming evidence of a cure. Millions of populations have gone back to normal and you now have the human observational studies to prove it.
The question is, what are you going to do with the info? Hope someone else does something for you?
It needs to be done locally so everyone needs to jump on this now, pass the info along. See this...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4002813/posts
Then every company in the country needs to lawyer up immediately. Sue their asses off. And sue. And sue. And sue. Stuff like this is a lawyer’s bread and butter.
If the mandate is “temporary,” then surely the text of the rule specifically discusses the conditions which transpire that will sunset the mandate. I wonder how we will know . . . .
Really? Are you sure about that?
Biden has no vaccine mandate. He’s only issued a press release that he is going to create one, but he hasn’t done it yet.
There’s going to be millions of frustrated good employees with a lot of time on their hands and a patriotic thoughts on their minds.
Every man has a divine right to defend their family.
America is worth fighting for as the God blessed nation it was and should return to.
The first sentence implies there is a vaccine mandate. There isn’t one.
I hope 100% do.
I have two concerns about this point, one extremely compelling.
The first concern is why are the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines still being administered under the Emergency Use Authorization when the FDA itself says:
What is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)?Wouldn't the availability of the FDA-approved Pfizer vaccine invalidate the need for the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson EUA?An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. Taking into consideration input from the FDA, manufacturers decide whether and when to submit an EUA request to FDA.
Secondly, and more importantly, the EUA vaccines require a patient informed consent form to be signed. United States case law says that any consent given under duress is not consent under the law.
It seems to me that forcing someone to get a vaccine or lose their jobs, their pay, and their family security, is the utmost coercive duress possible on someone.
Nobody can give a legally binding consent under these conditions, and for that reason these mandates to take the EUA vaccines should be challenged in court.
-PJ
“Still not legal.“
Yesindeeddydoody, but…. Who is going to stop them?
What are people like us gonna do - call a cop? Write to our congressman?
Folks, it’s gonna take a LOT more than trying to vote our way out of this.
The fda approved a Pfizer "vaccine", supposedly, similar to the one in use here, but it's not the same one.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.