Posted on 09/12/2021 10:00:02 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
A graduate of Yale University who also obtained a PHD at Princeton University and an MD degree from the John Hopkins University School of Medicine has published a paper in which she concludes that mandating the public to take a vaccine is a harmful and damaging act because of excellent scientific research papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) published a paper on September 9th analysing various studies that were published in August 2021 which prove the alleged Delta Covid-19 variant is evading the current Covid-19 injections on offer and therefore do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
Not peer-reviewed, but who cares?
First, autocorrect sucks.
Second. I noted the "no peer review" when I posted it.
The link serves as a counterexample to the talking point that only uneducated drunken incestuous rednecks from West Virginia reject the jabs.
The vaccines are working, just not against any alleged virus. The vaccines are working to spread the "delta variant". They are working to destroy people's means of employment and further destroy the country. They are working to further the global great reset.
“Peer Review” is corrupt and of little scientific value.
Freepmail.
Wanna know how you can learn an article is pure BS? When the author has to consistently remind the reader that the source has some credentials. Seriously, read that crap and count how many times Pierpoint’s title is mentioned.
Bkmk
Because that is the first refuge and accusation of those demanding universal jabbing. "Because SCIENCE!"™
...which, in their feeble minds, always means, "because (some) Credentials.
(Trivial counterexamples are Dubya having a Harvard MBA and Pat Robertson of the 700 Club having a Yale Law Degree.
But those don't exist, because *reasons*.)
“it was the word VACCINE that led people to believe it would...”
The CDC knows that, that’s why they changed the definition on Sept 1, removing “immunity” and replacing it with “protection”.
How much protection? Not specified. 1%? 100%?
The fauxine is NOT a vaccine.
The fauxine IS the virus.
100%
this is ludicrous, it is NOT SCIENCE when you change the definition of words due to political pressure from above, or even worse, it’s their intention all along and finally got a compliant/collaborator in office
“Peer Review” is corrupt and of little scientific value.
I disagree. Peer Review provides an opportunity for qualified peers to critique the design of the research and data analysis. Typically suggestion are given that would improve the work. Unfortunately the process is sometimes corrupted into censorship.
Peer review is the biggest scam in “science”. It assures that the “conventionally wise” will read only the conventional wisdom along the lines they already believe. Not many real breakthroughs come from that.
They changed the word so their drug qualifies as a vaccine because it doesn’t qualify under the old definition.
Now it qualifies, even though you can still catch the virus, spread it, and suffer or die from it.
But that’s rare! They say. It’s getting less rate with each passing week, by their own stats.
From the article: “From its origin in India, Delta has soared to nearly complete domination of COVID-19 viral strains everywhere in a matter of months, because it spreads so easily and infects both vaccinated and unvaccinated people.”
____________________
This is exactly what many have indicated would be the case with jabs that don’t kill the virus but allow it to mutate to more viral levels. Now what they want to do is shoot even more of the same concoction into the victims, I suppose their hoping for a better result.
My wife was on the telephone with Verizon in India today and the guy taking the call said wherever he was living, the government had the citizens in lockdown. I have separately heard that there are vaxed gov’t run states and there are unvaxed states in India with the vaxed chasing the dragon for their next fix. We are swiftly moving from a summer of discontent into the fall and winter of human tragedy.
After you read this and some of the other links, tell us how you feel re:
“So is there a test for the Delta variant?”
This is where things get a little tricky. Technically, there is a test for the Delta variant—but it’s not something you or your doctor has access to. “There is no commercial test for the Delta variant,” Amesh A. Adalja, MD, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, tells Health.
Instead, what happens is that a “selected sample” of positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are “further studied to look for the characteristic mutations of the Delta variant,” Dr. Adalja explains.
The CDC has a national SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance program that works to ID and track down variants of the virus that are circulating in the US. Under this program, the CDC regularly receives samples from state health departments and other public health agencies for genetic sequencing, further characterization, and evaluation, the CDC explains. The system processes 750 samples a week and then calculates a slew of information, including what percentage of cases are due to certain variants.
“This sequencing is only done at specialty labs,” Thomas Russo, MD, professor and chief of infectious disease at the University at Buffalo in New York, tells Health.
Basically, there’s a small chance that your positive COVID-19 test could be sent off to the CDC for genomic sequencing, but you wouldn’t know or find.
https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/is-there-a-test-for-delta-variant
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
