Posted on 06/29/2021 9:11:38 AM PDT by Red Badger
Maricopa County officials announced on Monday they will not use fraudulent voting equipment again. “The County will never use equipment that could pose a risk to free and fair elections.” On Monday, woke local Arizona journalist Jen Fifield shared some good news for a change.
Maricopa County will no longer use “compromised” voting machines. This announcement comes after Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobb’s May 20, 2021 letter, to the County, blaming the Arizona Senate for compromising the machines.
If we want free and fair elections, we should just go back to paper ballots.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I wonder if there will be a very large, sudden change in voter distribution
Hmm, Lindell and Powell are both In court right now defending themselves against dominion for saying that the machines were corrupt. This announcement should help their case against dominion
We need some original source research, here. There is a good chance that Maricopa county was just announcing that it would not use machines which were handled by the auditors. They may intend to go out and purchase/lease/rent new machines of the same type.
“If you build a better mousetrap, the world will beat a path to your door.”
One might think that some entrepreneur would create hardware and software for voting machines which would be open, transparent, fraud-proof, and easily auditable.
You could sell about a million of those. Right? I mean, every precinct in the country would be eager to have them — wouldn’t they? Right?
So now your saying the machines are bad. I thought it was fair and honest machines and elections. Maybe they have found out some things are coming.
that was my take
>>blaming the Arizona Senate for compromising the machines.
How does that work?
she is exposing the lie of certification. if certification works there should be no problem.
Why couldn't they? Back in the day, the height of the Chicago Democratic Machine, they could manufacture paper ballots by the carload. And how do you know that they're fraudulent without another source to compare totals with?
Took long enough
Dominion already has their money. But a lot of money, if not more, is made on licensing, updates and maintenance when it comes to this stuff, if I’m not mistaken(perhaps some of the tech folks on here can confirm and add more to that).
If this is true and more dominoes start to fall, it’ll be interesting what Dominion says, if anything. Afterall, they didn’t hand over the passwords to the folks in Maricopa Cty. One would think that would be some type of contempt but I doubt neither the politicians nor judges are willing to go that far.
I have so many missed opportuniies in life. I though about building voting machines 20 years ago. I make infinitely more comeplex systems daily, and I have a personal goal to simplify all systems I make mechanically, electrically, programmatically, and how it connectis to databases should be simple and elegant and not require a team of chimpanzees in India to charge 100 kilobucks to make a single we methods change. I could have saved the US eleventy billion dollars and saved the world from uncle joe sniffycrotch. Ahhhh, I have no doubt I would have had a seth rich type of accident
I would think with paper ballots it would be even easier.
Registered voters vs the number of ballots. Should be equal
Sure looks that way...
“This announcement comes after Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobb’s May 20, 2021 letter, to the County, blaming the Arizona Senate for compromising the machines.”
Only with a 100% turnout. Anything less than 100% how do you tell?
“If you build a better mousetrap, the world will create a better mouse.....................
There is a longer history of vote fraud using paper ballots and electro-mechanical voting machines than there ever was with electronic voting machines.
About the only thing I can think of is electronic voting with a human readable numbered receipt and tying the vote to a specific ballot on a specific machine.
If there are duplicate receipt numbers, then there is fraud. If the receipt doesn’t correspond to specific vote on a specific machine, it’s fraudulent. If voter sees the wrong names are on the receipt, then the ballot is spoiled or fraudulent.
There are still a lot of ways that probably be defrauded, but it might be a start.
Valid point.
I guess at the end of the day, without some type of biometrics, a legitimate scrubbing and strict adherence to voter rolls, every election will have to be investigated.
The process is so corrupted, by design, that without some serious safeguards and well thought out procedures, cheaters gonna cheat.
My 2cents....absentee voting with a copy of id attached...biometrics at the voting precints(fingerprints) and voter id...you don’t/can’t make it to the polls, then a vehicle equipped with a voting machine comes to your house, id-fingerprint-vote.
Biometrics, namely a fingerprint hash, might be the best way of all—combined with in-person voting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.