The Spike Protein of 'Vaccines' Is More Concerning than Previously Thought

Numerous respected journals have published new information showing the potential for the spike protein in the vaccines to travel throughout the body and serve as a toxic agent. Dr. Ryan Cole, a Mayo Clinic-trained anatomic and clinical pathologist who runs the largest independent laboratory in Idaho, shares this information and other concerns about the vaccine. He believes everyone needs to be screened before vaccination and that it should really be limited to those at risk who have not already been infected. He fears the long-term consequences of the gene sequence messing with our immune system, particularly in children.

You are such a worthless and dishonest troll!

I never even saw, read, or heard of the first "Deboooonked" paper. So it can't have influenced my assessment.

Gorski's "takedown" of the second paper is laughable.

His key point is "That’s half a billion particles, far, far more of a viral challenge than the amount of virus launching any “natural” infection by SARs-CoV-2."

But they're not looking at natural infection; they're looking at the spike protein.

The spike protein is produced by the body, after the mRNA injection since the mRNA *codes* for the spike protein. How many mRNAs per injection?

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/100592/how-many-mrna-strands-are-in-a-single-dose-of-the-covid-19-vaccines

(It's amazing how long I had to dig past all the 'Rah Rah mRNA vaccine YAY because SCIENCE!'™ articles I had to surf past, even though my search was VERBATIM "how many mrna molecules in pfizer". And even then I had to use DuckDuckGo; almost like Goolag is in on the cover-up.)

Well, we can work this out empirically.

We know that the average molecular mass of a base of a RNA is 339.5 g/mol.

However to calculate the approximate molecular mass of a single-stranded RNA molecule, you multiply the number of bases by 320.5 and add 159 (same source). This means for a single-stranded molecule of 1000 bases, it will have a molecular mass of 320,659 g/mol. The Pfizer vaccine has a sequence of 4284 bases.

4.284 * 320659 = 1373703.156 g/mol.

The Pfizer vaccine has 30 ug/shot (PDF, see page 27 under "Description") or 30x10^-6 grams

number of moles = mass/molar mass.

n= 30 x 10^-6 grams/137370.156 g/mol

n= 2.18 x 10-11

number of molecules = n (above) x Avogadro constant (6.022 x 10²³)

Number of molecules = 1.3 x 10¹³

Now this is a ball-park figure because the RNA isn't actually RNA it has had some special additions to the uridines that make it less susceptible to immune regulation, replacing the uridines with 1-methyl-3'-pseudouridylyl (see Wikipedia link to structure above). However, I believe this alteration to the mass, will not alter the number substantially; it'll still be in the 10 trillion range.

(some formatting lost, so don't yank my chain over Avogadro's number, troll-boi.)

So your deBOOOOOONker article, has an underestimate of the number of spike proteins, compared to the real live jab, of on the order of thousands. (The raw ratio is 1/20,000...so even allowing losses for manufacturing losses, degraded mRNA, etc., he's still underestimating the spike protein load by a factor of 1,000.)

FAIL.

And after getting into a long technical description of the internal biochemistry affected by the spike protein, your deBOOOOOOONker says this:

However, given the crapton of pseudovirus used in this hamster model, I really question any relevance of this system to vaccine safety issues with respect to mRNA- or adenovirus-based vaccines that produce the spike protein as an antigen. Why? The mRNA or adenovirus from the vaccines does not distribute extensively given that it’s an intramuscular injection, and the spike protein is highly unlikely to attain concentrations in the circulation anywhere near the high levels produced by the model used in these experiments....Add to that the fact that mRNA, even the modified mRNA in the vaccine, doesn’t hang around very long and therefore doesn’t generate spike protein for very long.

Who says you need anywhere near that level of concentration, given that the lipid capsules from the injection have already been demonstrated to propagate throughout the body? The problem is, recall that there are on the order of 1 *trillion* mRNA molecules injected into the body with the jab. Let's say only 1/2 of 1% of them make it out of the injection site. That's 50 billion spike mRNAs.

And the problem is, they get disseminated all throughout the body, as proven experimentally in mouse models. The spike protein is known to induce abnormal clotting in human blood even without the full virus present. So what happens when you have the spike protein being produced, in endothelial cells, say, in capillaries? Instant traffic backup on the blood. Or in the lungs? Or the brain? What are the long term sequelae, i.e., when the body takes out the cell presenting the spike protein? (Even *aside* from the possibility of the spike proteins presented on the cell's membrane getting loose.)

The third paper is the one which came from Harvard, about spike protein circulating in the blood following the jab. The deBOOOONKing line here, is that "the concentrations are so small."

50 picograms/milliliter. That is 50 x 10^-12 grams / mL of blood.

Tiny number, right?

50 x .000000000001 = .000000000005 grams / mL = 5.0 x10^-11 g/ mL.

But we're not concerned with mass. We're concerned with # of particles.

The mass of a single spike protein is 78.3 kDaltons.

7.83 x 10² Daltons / spike.

Let's convert Daltons to grams.

1 Dalton x 1 g / 6.022 x 10²³ Daltons.

So the mass of a single spike protein is 7.83 x 10² Daltons x (1 g / 6.022 x 10²³ Daltons)

= (78.3 / 6.022) x 10^(2-23) g

~ 13 x 10^-21 g /spike

or 1.3 x10^-20 g /spike

So go back to the blood concentration.

5.0 x10^-11 g/ ml x 1 spike / 1.3 x10^-20/ g

~5.0 x10^(-11+20) spike / ml

~5.0 x10^{9 spike/ml}

So that's 5 billion spike proteins per milliliter of blood.

Is that right? Did I screw up an exponent somewhere?

Or are your propagandists' articles blowing smoke?

BTW, here's another medical article which might interest you, troll-boi.

Turns out, when the human body attacks the COOF, it doesn't primarily make antibodies to the spike protein.

In fact, it targets a protein which is on the *interior* of the virus.

Now why are the Big Pharma clowns choosing the spike protein?

And why are they using undertested, experimental gene therapy?

Oh yeah. Profits. Moderna mentioned in their 2020 SEC filing that they were $1.74 billion in debt.

Nothing like turning down such a good drug as Ivermectin (whose discoverers got the Nobel Prize in Medicine for it) so you can declare a non-existent emergency (for a virus which has essentially a zero fatality rate for people under 50), to get the entire world to act as guinea pigs, for your trials of a novel delivery method you can't get approved any other way.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.